Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20170501


Dockets: A-408-15

A-409-15

A-410-15

A-411-15

A-412-15

A-413-15

Citation: 2017 FCA 91

[ENGLISH TRANSLATION]

CORAM:

NADON J.A.

GAUTHIER J.A.

TRUDEL J.A.

 

 

Docket: A-408-15

BETWEEN:

ANTOINE BÉRUBÉ

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Docket: A-409-15

BETWEEN:

ANTOINE BÉRUBÉ

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Docket: A-410-15

BETWEEN:

PHILIPPE D’AUTEUIL

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Docket: A-411-15

BETWEEN:

PHILIPPE D’AUTEUIL

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Docket: A-412-15

BETWEEN:

MARTIN FOURNIER GIGUÈRE

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Docket: A-413-15

BETWEEN:

MARTIN FOURNIER GIGUÈRE

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Heard at Quebec City, Quebec, on May 1, 2017.

Judgment delivered from the bench at Quebec City, Quebec, on May 1, 2017.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

NADON J.A.


Date: 20170501


Dockets: A-408-15

A-409-15

A-410-15

A-411-15

A-412-15

A-413-15

Citation: 2017 FCA 91

CORAM:

NADON J.A.

GAUTHIER J.A.

TRUDEL J.A.

 

 

Docket: A-408-15

BETWEEN:

ANTOINE BÉRUBÉ

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Docket: A-409-15

BETWEEN:

ANTOINE BÉRUBÉ

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Docket: A-410-15

BETWEEN:

PHILIPPE D’AUTEUIL

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Docket: A-411-15

BETWEEN:

PHILIPPE D’AUTEUIL

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Docket: A-412-15

BETWEEN:

MARTIN FOURNIER GIGUÈRE

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Docket: A-413-15

BETWEEN:

MARTIN FOURNIER GIGUÈRE

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the bench at Quebec City, Quebec, on May 1, 2017.)

NADON J.A.

[1]  Despite the very able presentation by counsel for the appellants, we are of the view that our intervention is not warranted. More specifically, we were not satisfied that the judge had committed an error in law or a palpable and overriding error in assessing the relevant facts.

[2]  Accordingly, the appeal will be dismissed with only one set of costs for the six files.

[3]  A copy of these reasons will be placed in the related files to serve as reasons therein.

“M. Nadon”

J.A.

Certified true translation

Janine Anderson, Revisor


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

SOLICITORS OF RECORD


DOCKETS:

A-408-15, A-409-15, A-410-15,

A-411-15, A-412,15, A-413-13

STYLE OF CAUSE:

A-408-15

ANTOINE BÉRUBÉ v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

A-409-15

ANTOINE BÉRUBÉ v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

A-410-15

PHILIPPE D’AUTEUIL v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

A-411-15

PHILIPPE D’AUTEUIL v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

A-412-15

MARTIN FOURNIER GIGUÈRE v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

A-413-15

MARTIN FOURNIER GIGUÈRE v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

QUEBEC CITY, QUEBEC

 

DATE OF HEARING:

MAY 1, 2017

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

NADON J.A.

GAUTHIER J.A.

TRUDEL J.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

NADON J.A.

 

APPEARANCES:

Bernard Roy

Marie Cossette

 

FOR THE APPELLANTS

 

Simon Vincent

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

LAVERY, DE BILLY, LLP.

Quebec City, Quebec

 

FOR THE APPELLANTS

 

William F. Pentney

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.