Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20041125

Docket: A-87-04

Citation: 2004 FCA 400

CORAM:        DÉCARY J.A.

SEXTON J.A.

EVANS J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                         THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                           and

KICHUSA GIBBS

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                       Heard at Toronto, Ontario on November 25, 2004.

                 Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on November 25, 2004.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                                     EVANS J.A.


Date: 20041125

Docket: A-87-04

Citation: 2004 FCA 400

CORAM:        DÉCARY J.A.

SEXTON J.A.

EVANS J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                         THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                           and

KICHUSA GIBBS

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                                    REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on November 25, 2004)

EVANS J.A.

[1]                Counsel for the Minister conceded that whether a claimant for employment insurance benefits is available for work is essentially a question of fact. In the absence of a misstatement of the relevant legal principles, the board of referees' finding that the respondent was available for work should not be disturbed if rationally supportable on the evidence.


[2]                We are not persuaded that the board's finding was irrational.

[3]                For these reasons, the application for judicial review of the Umpire's decision upholding the board of referees will be dismissed.

"John M. Evans"

                                                                                                                                                      J.A.                 


                                                  FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                                                                             

                            NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                           A-87-04

STYLE OF CAUSE:               THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Applicant

and                   

KICHUSA GIBBS      

Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:                     TORONTO, ONTARIO

DATE OF HEARING:                       NOVEMBER 25, 2004

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

OF THE COURT :                             (DÉCARY, SEXTON, EVANS JJ.A.)

DELIVERED FROM THE

BENCH BY:                                        EVANS J.A.

APPEARANCES:

           

Sharon McGovern                                 For the Applicant

Kichusa Gibbs                           For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:          

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada      For the Applicant

Kichusa Gibbs

Brampton, ON                                     For the Respondent


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.