Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20050623

Docket: A-619-04

Citation: 2005 FCA 245

CORAM:        RICHARD C.J.

DÉCARY J.A.

NOËL J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                             ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                           and

                                                           DOUGLAS P. SMITH

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

Heard at St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, on June 23, 2005.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, on June 23, 2005.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                                       NOËL J.A.


Date: 20050623

Docket: A-619-04

Citation: 2005 FCA 245

CORAM:        RICHARD C.J.

DÉCARY J.A.

NOËL J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                             ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                           and

                                                           DOUGLAS P. SMITH

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, on June 23, 2005)

NOËL J.A.

[1]                This is an application for judicial review by the Attorney General from a decision of an Umpire allowing the respondent's appeal and setting aside the prior decision of the Board of Referees.


[2]                The Umpire found that the respondent was available for employment under paragraph 18(a) of the Employment Insurance Act, S.C. 1996, c. 23 despite being enrolled in a course of instruction.

[3]                In our view, there was no basis for the Umpire's intervention. The Board of Referees found that the claimant was not actively seeking employment during the relevant period, a finding that was amply supported by the evidence (Faucher v. Canada, [1997] F.C.J. 215 (FCA)).

[4]                The application for judicial review will therefore be allowed, the decision of the Umpire will be set aside and the matter will be remitted to the Chief Umpire or his designate for a new determination on the basis that the respondent was not available for work during the relevant period. As no costs were sought, none are awarded.

                "Marc Noël"                            

J.A.


                                                  FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                            NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                                   A-619-04

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                       ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

v. DOUGLAS P. SMITH

PLACE OF HEARING:                                             St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador

DATE OF HEARING:                                               June 23, 2005

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: RICHARD C.J.

DÉCARY J.A.

NOËL J.A.


DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:                             NOËL J.A.

DATED:                                                                      June 23, 2005

APPEARANCES:

Mr. W. Dean Smith                                                       for the Applicant

Mr. Douglas P. Smith                                        Respondent on his own behalf

Mr. Frederick Smith

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

John H. Sims, Q.C.                                                       for the Applicant

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario

Mr. Douglas P. Smith                                        Respondent on his own behalf

Mr. Frederick Smith                                                     


Hillview, NL


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.