Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Canada (Attorney General) v. Caron

Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date 2007-05-28
Neutral citation 2007 FCA 204
File numbers A-322-06

Decision Content

 

Date: 20070528

Docket: A-322-06

Citation: 2007 FCA 204

 

CORAM:       LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

                        NADON J.A.

                        PELLETIER J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Applicant

and

MARCO CARON

Respondent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hearing held at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 28, 2007.

Judgment delivered from the bench at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 28, 2007.

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                    LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

 

 

Date: 20070528

Docket: A-322-06

Citation: 2007 FCA 204

 

CORAM:       LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

                        NADON J.A.

                        PELLETIER J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Applicant

and

MARCO CARON

Respondent

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the bench at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 28, 2007)

 

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

 

[1]               The outcome of this case is governed by the settled jurisprudence of our Court that a return to school, including a training course, is not just cause for leaving an employment within the meaning of sections 29 and 30 of the Employment Insurance Act, S.C. 1996, c. 23 (Act): see Canada (Attorney General) v. Barnett, [1996] F.C.J. No. 1289; Canada (Attorney General) v. Bois, 2001 FCA 175; Canada (Attorney General) v. Connell, 2003 FCA 144; Canada (Attorney General) v. Lessard, 2002 FCA 469; Canada (Attorney General) v. Martel (F.C.A.), [1994] F.C.J. No. 1458; and Canada (Attorney General) v. Traynor, [1995] F.C.J. No. 836.

 

[2]               Furthermore, CUB 53009, which was the basis of the Umpire’s determination in this case, was set aside by our Court: see Canada (Attorney General) v. Connell, supra.

 

[3]               For these reasons, the application for judicial review will be allowed without costs, since the respondent did not oppose the application. The decision of the Umpire will be set aside and the matter will be remitted to the Chief Umpire or his or her delegate for redetermination on the basis that the respondent is disqualified from receiving benefits by operation of sections 29 and 30 of the Act.

 

“Gilles Létourneau”

J.A.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certified true translation

Mary Jo Egan, LLB

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                                                              A-322-06

 

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                              ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA v. MARCO CARON

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                                                        Fredericton, New Brunswick

 

 

DATE OF HEARING:                                                          May 28, 2007

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT                                            LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

OF THE COURT BY:                                                           NADON J.A.

                                                                                                PELLETIER J.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:                            LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

 

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Sandra Doucette

FOR THE APPLICANT

 

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

John H. Sims, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE APPLICANT

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.