Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Federal Court of Appeal

 

Cour d'appel fédérale

Date: 20110216

Dockets: A-341-10

A-342-10

Citation: 2011 FCA 59

 

Present:          NOËL J.A.

Docket: A-341-10

BETWEEN:

EARL BABICH

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

 

Docket: A-342-10

BETWEEN:

ABLE ENTERPRISES LTD.

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

 

Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties.

 

Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on February 16, 2011.

 

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:                                                                                           NOËL J.A.

 


Federal Court of Appeal

 

Cour d'appel fédérale

Date: 20110216

Dockets: A-341-10

A-342-10

Citation: 2011 FCA 59

 

Present:          NOËL J.A.

 

Docket: A-341-10

BETWEEN:

EARL BABICH

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

 

Docket: A-342-10

BETWEEN:

ABLE ENTERPRISES LTD.

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

 

 

REASONS FOR ORDER

 

 

NOËL J.A.

[1]               I am seized in file A-342-10 with a motion by the corporate appellant to authorize Mr. Earl Babich to represent it as well as motions by the appellants in both files A-342-10 and A-342-10 to settle the contents of the appeal book.

 

[2]               Dealing with the first motion, the respondent opposes the order sought because the evidence of impecuniosity is not sufficient and the appellant has not demonstrated that this matter will proceed expeditiously.

 

[3]               Having considered the evidence, I am satisfied that the appellant is unable to pay for a lawyer and that accordingly alternative representation must be considered. Although the absence of legal representation may result in procedural complications, Mr. Babich is authorized as of right to act on his own behalf, and it seems logical that he should also be authorized to act on behalf of the corporate appellant. An order will be issued accordingly.

 

[4]               Turning to the appeal book, the respondent proposes to include the pleadings, all the evidence tendered by the parties, as well as all evidentiary and jurisdictional rulings made by the Trial Judge. The respondent wishes to add a number of documents which were not in evidence at trial.

 

[5]               I am satisfied that there are no circumstances in this case which would justify a departure from the generally accepted rule which is to restrict the contents of the appeal book to the material that was before the Trial Judge. The appeal book will accordingly be constituted by the documents proposed by the respondent and listed at paragraph 2 of its respective motion records filed November 12, 2010.

 

 

“Marc Noël”

J.A.


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                                                              A-341-10

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                              EARL BABICH and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

 

MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES

 

 

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:                                             Noël J.A.

 

DATED:                                                                                 February 16, 2011

 

 

WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:

 

 

Earl Babich

FOR THE APPELLANT

(SELF-REPRESENTED)

 

Raj Grewal

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

N/A

FOR THE APPELLANT

(SELF-REPRESENTED)

 

MYLES J. KIRVAN

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                                                              A-342-10

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                              ABLE ENTERPRISES LTD. and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

 

MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES

 

 

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:                                             Noël J.A.

 

DATED:                                                                                 February 16, 2011

 

 

WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:

 

 

Earl Babich

FOR THE APPELLANT

(SELF-REPRESENTED)

 

Raj Grewal

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

N/A

FOR THE APPELLANT

(SELF-REPRESENTED)

 

MYLES J. KIRVAN

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.