Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Federal Court of Appeal

 

Cour d'appel fédérale

 

Date: 20110609

Docket: A-93-10

Citation: 2011 FCA 197

 

CORAM:       NOËL J.A.

                        PELLETIER J.A.

                        MAINVILLE J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

2786885 CANADA INC.

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

 

 

 

 

Heard at Montréal, Quebec, on June 8, 2011.

Judgment delivered at Montréal, Quebec, on June 9, 2011.

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:                                                                                   NOËL J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY                                                                                            PELLETIER J.A.

                                                                                                                              MAINVILLE J.A.

 

 


Federal Court of Appeal

 

Cour d'appel fédérale

Date: 20110609

Docket: A-93-10

Citation: 2011 FCA 197

 

CORAM:       NOËL J.A.

                        PELLETIER J.A.

                        MAINVILLE J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

2786885 CANADA INC.

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

NOËL J.A.

[1]               This is an appeal from a decision of Favreau J. of the Tax Court of Canada (the Tax Court Judge) who dismissed the corporate taxpayer’s appeal from assessments made under Part IX of the Excise Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. E-15 (ETA), on the basis that it was filed out of time, and that he did not have the authority for extending the time period within which the appeal could be filed.

 

[2]               The facts are not controversial. For present purposes, we need only note that the decision confirming the assessments was made on January 21, 1998 and the notice of appeal was filed on June 18, 2009, some eleven (11) years later.

 

[3]               Pursuant to section 306 of the ETA, the appellant had a period of 90 days from the date of the confirmation (i.e. January 21, 1998) to file his notice of appeal. While the appellant could have sought an extension of time, subsection 305(5) of the ETA provides that no such order can be made unless the application is brought “within one year after the expiration of the time otherwise limited … for appealing;”. It follows that the Tax Court Judge had no authority to extend the time and that he properly dismissed the appeal.

 

[4]               I would dismiss the appeal with costs.

 

 

 

 

 

“Marc Noël”

J.A.

 

“I agree.

J.D. Denis Pelletier J.A.”

 

“I agree.

Robert M. Mainville J.A.”

 

 


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                                                              A-93-10

 

(APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF FAVREAU J. OF THE TAX COURT OF CANADA DATED JANUARY 19, 2010, DOCKET NUMBER 2009-2035(GST)I).

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                              2786885 CANADA INC.  and

                                                                                                HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                                                        Montréal, Quebec

 

DATE OF HEARING:                                                          June 8, 2011

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:                                     NOËL J.A.

 

CONCURRED IN BY:                                                         PELLETIER J.A.

                                                                                                MAINVILLE J.A.

 

DATED:                                                                                 June 9, 2011

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Stephen M. Byer

FOR THE APPELLANT

 

Danny Galarneau

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Stephen M.Byer

Verdun, Quebec

 

FOR THE APPELLANT

 

Larivière Meunier

Québec, Quebec

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.