Date: 20120910
Docket: A-473-11
Citation: 2012 FCA 232
CORAM: NADON J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
ELI LILLY CANADA INC.,
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY,
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY LIMITED
and ELI LILLY SA
Appellants
And
NOVOPHARM LIMITED
Respondent
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on September 10, 2012.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on September 10, 2012.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A.
Date: 20120910
Docket: A-473-11
Citation: 2012 FCA 232
CORAM: NADON J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
ELI LILLY CANADA INC.,
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY,
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY LIMITED
and ELI LILLY SA
Appellants
And
NOVOPHARM LIMITED
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on September 10, 2012)
[1] Despite the able submissions of counsel for the appellant, we have not been persuaded that the judgment under appeal is based on any error of law or principle or any palpable and overriding error of fact.
[2] This appeal will be dismissed with costs.
“M. Nadon”
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-473-11
STYLE OF CAUSE: Eli Lilly Canada Inc. & al
v. Novopharm Limited
PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: September 10, 2012
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NADON J.A.
APPEARANCES:
|
Anthony G. Creber Cristin A. Wagner Livia Aumand
|
FOR THE APPELLANTS
|
|
Jonathan Stainsby Andrew Skodyn Neil Fineberg
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP Ottawa, Ontario |
FOR THE APPELLANTS
|
|
Heenan Blaikie LLP Toronto, Ontario |
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|