Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20200408


Docket: A-15-20

Citation: 2020 FCA 72

CORAM:

DE MONTIGNY J.A.

WOODS J.A.

LASKIN J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

TEVA CANADA LIMITED

Appellant

and

BAYER INC. and BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH, APOTEX INC., TARO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and SANDOZ CANADA INC.

Respondents

Heard by teleconference at Ottawa, Ontario, and Toronto, Ontario, on April 1, 2020.

Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on April 8, 2020.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

LASKIN J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY:

DE MONTIGNY J.A.

WOODS J.A.

 


Date: 20200408


Docket: A-15-20

Citation: 2020 FCA 72

CORAM:

DE MONTIGNY J.A.

WOODS J.A.

LASKIN J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

TEVA CANADA LIMITED

Appellant

and

BAYER INC. and BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH, APOTEX INC., TARO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and SANDOZ CANADA INC.

Respondents

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

LASKIN J.A.

[1]  The attached copy of the reasons for judgment in file A-16-20 shall constitute the reasons for judgment in this appeal.

“J.B. Laskin”

J.A.

“I agree.

Yves de Montigny J.A.”

“I agree.

Judith Woods J.A.”


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


 

Docket:

A-15-20

STYLE OF CAUSE:

TEVA CANADA LIMITED v. BAYER INC. and BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH, APOTEX INC., TARO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and SANDOZ CANADA INC.

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

by teleconference at Ottawa, Ontario, and Toronto, Ontario

DATE OF HEARING:

April 1, 2020

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

LASKIN J.A.

 

CONCURRED IN BY:

DE MONTIGNY J.A.

WOODS J.A.

 

DATED:

April 8, 2020

 

APPEARANCES:

J. Bradley White

Faylene Lunn

 

For The Appellant

 

Melissa Binns

Will Boyer

Natalia Thawe

 

For The Respondents Bayer iNc. and BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH

 

Daniel Cappe

Harry Radomski

FOR THE RESPONDENT apotex inc.

Andrew Mandlsohn

FOR THE RESPONDENT TARO PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

Carol Hitchman

Meghan A. Dureen, Ph.D.

FOR THE RESPONDENT SANDOZ CANADA INC.

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP

Ottawa, Ontario

For The Appellant

 

Gowling WLG

Hamilton and Ottawa, Ontario

 

For The Respondents Bayer iNc. and BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH

 

Goodmans LLP

Toronto, Ontario

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT apotex inc.

Fineberg Ramamoorthy LLP

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT taro pharmaceuticals INC.

Sprigings Intellectual Property Law

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT SANDOZ CANADA INC.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.