Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20141015


Docket: A-436-13

Citation: 2014 FCA 232

CORAM:

NADON J.A.

GAUTHIER J.A.

WEBB J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

EDWARD ANDREW DENNIS, HAROLD BELL, NATHAN VICTOR MACKLIN AND IAN LORNE MACCREARY

Appellants

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE AND AGRIFOOD AND THE CANADIAN WHEAT BOARD

Respondents

Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 15, 2014.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 15, 2014.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

NADON J.A.

 

 


Date: 20141015


Docket: A-436-13

Citation: 2014 FCA 232

CORAM:

NADON J.A.

GAUTHIER J.A.

WEBB J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

 

EDWARD ANDREW DENNIS, HAROLD BELL, NATHAN VICTOR MACKLIN AND IAN LORNE MACCREARY

 

Appellants

 

and

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE AND AGRIFOOD AND THE CANADIAN WHEAT BOARD

 

Respondents

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 15, 2014).

NADON J.A.

[1]               Despite Mr. Shrybman’s forcefull submissions, we are of the view, substantially for the reasons given by Madam Justice Tremblay-Lamer in her decision of November 29, 2013, that the appellants’ claims for expropriation and breach of trust, the only claims pursued by the appellants in their appeal, should be struck.

[2]               As concerns the cross-appeal, we have not been persuaded that we should interfere with the judge’s conclusion that the mismanagement claims should not be struck.

[3]               For these reasons, the appeal and the cross-appeal will be dismissed with costs.

"M Nadon"

J.A.

 


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


Docket:

A-436-13

 

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

EDWARD ANDREW DENNIS, HAROLD BELL, NATHAN VICTOR MACKLIN AND IAN LORNE MACCREARY v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE AND AGRIFOOD AND THE CANADIAN WHEAT BOARD

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

Ottawa, Ontario

 

DATE OF HEARING:

October 15, 2014

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

NADON J.A.

GAUTHIER J.A.

WEBB J.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

NADON J.A.

APPEARANCES:

Steven Shrybman

Ben Piper

Anders Bruun

 

For The Appellants

 

Mark Kindrachuk

Jennifer Souter

 

For The Respondents

 

Lawrence Thacker

 

For The Respondents

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

SACK GOLDBLATT MITCHELL LLP

Ottawa, Ontario

 

For The Appellants

 

William F. Pentney

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario

 

For The Respondents

 

LENCZNER SLAGHT ROYCE SMITH GRIFFIN LLP

Toronto, Ontario

 

For The Respondents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.