Date: 20141105
Docket: A-267-14
Citation: 2014 FCA 259
|
CORAM: |
NOËL C.J. GAUTHIER J.A. BOIVIN J.A.
|
|
BETWEEN: |
|
|
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA |
|
|
Applicant |
|
|
and |
|
|
ANTHONY SCHOOLCRAFT |
|
|
Respondent |
|
Heard at Montréal, Quebec, on November 5, 2014.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on November 5, 2014.
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: |
BOIVIN J.A. |
Date: 20141105
Docket: A-267-14
Citation: 2014 FCA 259
|
CORAM: |
NOËL C.J. GAUTHIER J.A. BOIVIN J.A.
|
|
|
BETWEEN: |
|
|
|
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA |
|
|
|
Applicant |
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
ANTHONY SCHOOLCRAFT |
|
|
|
Respondent |
|
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on November 5, 2014).
BOIVIN J.A.
[1] Despite the forceful argument of counsel for the applicant, we have not been persuaded that the Canada Agricultural Review Tribunal committed a reviewable error.
[2] It was open to the Tribunal to conclude as it did, on the basis of the evidence on record. What we are being asked to do is to conduct a trial de novo and reach the opposite conclusion. This is not the role of this Court.
[3] The application for judicial review will be dismissed.
“Richard Boivin”
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
|
DOCKET: |
A-267-14
|
|
STYLE OF CAUSE: |
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA v. ANTHONY SCHOOLCRAFT
|
|
PLACE OF HEARING: |
Montréal, Quebec
|
|
DATE OF HEARING: |
November 5, 2014
|
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: |
NOËL C.J. GAUTHIER J.A. BOIVIN J.A.
|
|
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: |
BOIVIN J.A. |
APPEARANCES:
|
Dominique Guimond
|
For The Applicant ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
William F. Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario
|
For The Applicant ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
|