Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20060717

Docket: IMM-3870-06

Citation: 2006 FC 885

Toronto, Ontario, July 17, 2006

PRESENT:      The Honourable Mr. Justice Shore

BETWEEN:

JAMILA HASSAN MOHAMED JIWA

Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY

AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

Respondent

REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

[1]                The Court heard the applicant's motion for a stay on an urgent basis.

[2]                Despite the able arguments advanced by counsel for the applicant, the Court dismisses the application for a stay. Even if the Court were to assume that the applicant had raised a serious issue to be tried, the applicant has not established the existence of any irreparable harm as is recognized from the Pre-Removal Risk Assessment which is based substantially on her refugee claim which failed on the basis of a lack of credibility in respect of both the (personal) subjective and (country condition) objective evidence.

[3]                The Court finds no irreparable harm to the applicant and the balance of convenience lies in favour of executing the removal order against the Applicant.

[4]                The application for a stay of removal is denied.


ORDER

THIS COURT ORDERS that the application for a stay of removal be denied.

"Michel M.J. Shore"

Judge


FEDERAL COURT

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                           IMM-3870-06

STYLE OF CAUSE:                           JAMILA HASSAN MOHAMED JIWA

v. THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY

AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

PLACE OF HEARING:                     Toronto, Ontario

DATE OF HEARING:                       July 17, 2006

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER:                                    SHORE J.

DATED:                                              July 17, 2006

APPEARANCES:

Ms. Wennie Lee

FOR THE APPLICANT

Mr. Greg G. George

FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

LEE & COMPANY

Barrister & Solicitor

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE APPLICANT

JOHN H. SIMS, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.