Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20010418

Docket: T-336-97

                                                       Neutral Citation: 2001 FCT 337

BETWEEN:

                                      NOEL AYANGMA

                                                                                               Plaintiff

                                                 - and -

                            HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                                                           Defendant

                 REASONS FOR ASSESSMENT OF COSTS

François Pilon

[1]                This party and party assessment of the defendant's costs took place on April 5, 2001 with Mr. Michael Donovan appearing on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen. Proof of service of the bill of costs and of the notice of appointment for assessment upon the plaintiff was filed but Mr. Ayangma was not present.


[2]                By Order dated June 21, 2001 the Court struck out the statement of claim and fixed the costs of the plaintiff's motion to amend its claim and the defendant's motion to strike it in the amount of $1,500.00. Mr. Donovan is now submitting various disbursements to be assessed.

[3]                The travel expenses of counsel, Mr. Harvey Newman, to attend the hearing of the motions in Charlottetown on March 11, 1998 are submitted in the amount of $1,463.30. The following items are supported by evidence and are allowed as claimed:

- air fare from Ottawa to Halifax, return $547.96

- taxis to and from the Ottawa airport     $46.00

- gasoline                                                           $41.00

- various other expenses                                    $41.50

[4]                The amount of $261.00 appears on Mr. Newman's expense claim for car rental. However the exhibit in support is in the amount of $385.00 plus H.S.T. for the rental period from February 28 to March 11, 1998. Mr. Donovan explains that the amount of $261.00 represents the rental charges for the Halifax to Charlottetown portion only. Upon reflection I think this amount is too high. Instead I will allow the standard daily rate of $36.00 and $10.00 for insurance coverage plus H.S.T. The total rental charge allowed will be $105.80.


[5]                The invoices for hotel accommodation are not very clear to me, but the amount of $345.00 will be allowed as suggested by Mr. Donovan. This figure represents accommodation for three nights (two at Halifax and one at Charlottetown) at the rate of $100.00 per night plus H.S.T.     Mr. Newman's travel expenses will be allowed in the amount of $1,227.26. The other disbursements for photocopying charges are allowed as presented.

[6]                The defendant's bill of costs is assessed and allowed in the amount of $2,815.26.

                                                                                    "François Pilon"       

Assessment Officer

Dated April 18, 2001.


                           FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                       TRIAL DIVISION

    NAMES OF SOLICITORS AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

                                                                                Docket: T-336-97

                                                                                                           

                                      NOEL AYANGMA

Plaintiff

                                                 - and -

                              HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Defendant

PLACE AND DATE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia, April 5, 2001

REASONS BY:    F. Pilon, Assessment Officer

DATE OF REASONS: April 18, 2001

APPEARANCES:

No one appearing                                                            for the Plaintiff

Michael Donovan                                                        for the Defendant

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario                                                          for the Defendant

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.