Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20021217

                        Docket: IMM-6260-02

Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 1310

Toronto, Ontario, Tuesday, the 17th day of December, 2002

PRESENT:      The Honourable Mr. Justice O'Keefe

BETWEEN:

ENRIK HAXHILLARI

Applicant

- and -

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

[1]                 This is a motion by the Applicant, Enrik Haxhillari, for an order staying his

removal from Canada scheduled for December 17, 2002.

[2]                 The Applicant is a citizen of Albania who arrived in Canada on July 29, 2000 and

claimed Convention Refugee status upon his arrival.


[3]                 On February 25, 2002, the Applicant was declared not to be a Convention Refugee.

[4]                 The Applicant submitted a PDRCC application under the former Immigration Act.

[5]                 The Applicant later submitted a Post-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA) under the new

Immigration Regulations.

[6]                 The Applicant met Lioudmila Petcherskaia in December 2001 and married her on April

14, 2002.

[7]                 The Applicant received a negative PRRA decision on December 2, 2002 and was told

that he would be deported on December 17, 2002.

[8]                 The Applicant and his wife completed an inland sponsorship application which was sent

to the Respondent on June 1, 2002.

[9]                 The Applicant and his wife's doctor stated that both, the Applicant and his wife, "exhibit

symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder...".

[10]            The Applicant asked for a deferral of his removal, but the officer told the Applicant he

could not defer as his only job was to give the papers.

  

[11]            Issue : Should a stay be granted?

Analysis and Decision

[12]            In order to grant a stay, I must be satisfied that:

1.         The Applicant has raised a serious issue to be tried.

2.         The Applicant will suffer irreparable harm if removed.

3.         The balance of convenience favors the Applicant.

[13]            The Applicant must meet all three conditions.

Serious Issue

[14]            I am satisfied that the Applicant has raised a serious issue and that issue is whether the

officer has a discretion to defer a removal.

Irreparable Harm

[15]            I am of the view, based on the medical report that the Applicant's medical condition

would suffer if he was removed from Canada. As well, I am satisfied from a perusal of the documentary evidence that persons in the Applicant's political position could be subject to persecution in Albania. These factors constitute irreparable harm.


Balance of convenience

[16]            The balance of convenience favors the Applicant. He is not a threat to the public and the

Respondent will still be free to deport him at a later date if he is unsuccessful with his application.

[17]            The motion for a stay is therefore allowed.

  

ORDER

The removal of the Applicant from Canada is stayed until the Applicant's application for leave for judicial review is denied or if leave is granted until the application for judicial review is disposed of by the Court.

                                                                                                                                         "John A. O'Keefe"             

line

                                                                                                                                                          J.F.C.C.                         


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                 TRIAL DIVISION

Names of counsel and solicitors of record

                                                                                   

DOCKET:                                              IMM-6260-02

STYLE OF CAUSE:              ENRIK HAXHILLARI

                                                                                                                                                         Applicant

- and -

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                     Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:                      TORONTO, ONTARIO

DATE OF HEARING:                        MONDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2002   

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY:                               O'KEEFE J.

DATED:                                                 TUESDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2002     

APPEARANCES BY:                          Ms. M. Christina F. Kurata

For the Applicant

Mr. John Loncar

For the Respondent

                                                                                                                                                                       

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:           Ms. M. Christina F. Kurata

                                                                Barrister & Solicitor

206 Bloor St. West, Suite 7

Toronto, Ontario

M5S 1T8

For the Applicant             

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For the Respondent


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                                         

                                                              Date: 20021217

                                       Docket: IMM-6260-02

BETWEEN:

ENRIK HAXHILLARI

                                                                         Applicant

- and -

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                     Respondent

                                                   

REASONS FOR ORDER AND

ORDER

                                                   

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.