Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                                Date: 20050916

                                                                                                                    Docket: IMM-10206-04

                                                                                                                   Citation: 2005 FC 1258

BETWEEN:

                                                        Mariana Cabrera Arvizu

                                                  Omar Israel Huerta Rodriguez

                                                                                                                                        Applicants

                                                                         -and-

                                                    MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

                                                            AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                     Respondent

                                                        REASONS FOR ORDER

PINARD J.

[1]         This is an application for judicial review of a decision by the Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board (the IRB) dated November 18, 2004, that the applicants are not "Convention refugees", or "persons in need of protection" as defined under sections 96 and 97, respectively of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27.

[2]         Mariana Cabrera Arvizu (the female applicant) and her husband Omar Israel Huerta Rodriguez (the applicant) are citizens of Mexico.


[3]         The female applicant had worked for the Women's Institute of the Federal District of Mexico since May 2000, as a social worker. It was a help centre for women victims of conjugal violence. The female applicant says that she was threatened by the husband of a battered woman whom she counselled and helped leave Mexico.

[4]         This is a pure question of credibility and assessment of the facts. After hearing the parties' representatives and reviewing the evidence, I am not persuaded that the IRB's decision was based on an erroneous finding of fact made in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard for the evidence before it (see paragraph 18.1(4)(d) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7). The inferences drawn by the specialized tribunal that is the IRB appear reasonable to me (see Aguebor v. Canada (M.E.I.), 160 N.R. 315 (F.C.A.)). I am particularly satisfied that the many inconsistencies, omissions and implausibilities identified by the IRB are well supported by the evidence, including the testimony of the female applicant herself and the documentary evidence.

[5]         For all of these reasons, the application for judicial review is dismissed.

          "Yvon Pinard"             

                JUDGE

OTTAWA, ONTARIO

September 16, 2005

Certified true translation

Kelley A. Harvey, BCL, LLB


                                                             FEDERAL COURT

                                                      SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                       IMM-10206-04

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                      MARIANA CABRERA ARVIZU, OMAR ISRAEL HUERTA RODRIGUEZ v. MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

PLACE OF HEARING:                                  Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:                                    August 17, 2005

REASONS FOR ORDER:                            Pinard J.

DATE OF REASONS:                                  September 16, 2005           

APPEARANCES:

Peter Karavoulias                                          FOR THE APPLICANTS

Marc Bernard

Sherry Rafai Far                                            FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Peter Karavoulias                                          FOR THE APPLICANTS

Montréal, Quebec

John H. Sims, Q.C.                                        FOR THE RESPONDENT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.