Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 19980216


Docket: IMM-3718-97

Ottawa, Ontario, February 16, 1998

Present: The Honourable Mr. Justice Muldoon

BETWEEN:

     GHOLAM SAKHI NIAZI,

     SHAKILA NIAZI,

     SADAF NIAZI,

     YAMA NIAZI and

     SHABNAM NIAZI,

     Applicants,

     - and -

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION,

     Respondent.

     REASONS AND ORDER

MULDOON, J.

[1]      The applicants seek leave to institute judicial review proceedings against the Convention Refugee Determination Division's (CRDD's) decision dated August 8, 1997. The CRDD found that the adult applicants were terrible liars, and documented its findings. This was unfortunate as the applicants must now realize and repent. Perhaps they thought that the nice Canadians were just push-overs.

[2]      If what the male adult applicant says in his affidavit sworn on September 28th, 1997, be now, at least, mostly true then the applicants should pray for and apply for a favourable compassionate review of their case, because the affidavit is too late for use in the reviewing of the CRDD's decision. It is well known, of course, that the Taliban are savagely repressive of all women, and that their interpretation and application of Shari'a are so ignorantly fanatical as to be neither merciful nor compassionate. Returning to Afghanistan, if they must, would be an ugly experience for the female applicant if not the whole family, as the documentary evidence alone demonstrates.

[3]      But, after all, judicial review concerns itself with the manner in which the CRDD came to its decision, and this Court can find no fault with that. Therefore:

     ORDER

Leave is refused.

                                

Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.