Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20020314

Docket: T-195-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 284

Montreal, Quebec, March 14, 2002

Present:           Richard Morneau, Esq., Prothonotary

BETWEEN:

                                                              DR. NOËL AYANGMA

                                                                                                                                                          Plaintiff

                                                                                 and

                                                        HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                                                                                                                      Defendant

Motion by the Defendant for an Order pursuant to Rule 8 of the Federal Court Rules, 1998, varying the Direction of Associate Chief Justice Lutfy, dated January 28, 2002.

                                               REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

[1]                 At the request of the Associate Chief Justice, I hereby adjudicate upon the motion at bar. I am of the view that this motion should fail with costs in the cause, and consequently the Direction of the Associate Chief Justice dated January 28, 2002 stands.


[2]                 It must be remembered that as matters stand now, no show cause orders for alleged contempt are in place since Justice MacKay on January 25, 2002 denied the Plaintiff's motion for such relief. For a show cause order to be present, the Federal Court of Appeal would have to grant the Plaintiff's appeal from the decision of Justice MacKay. This outcome is only a possibility for now. In addition, any show cause order would constitute only the first step of the contempt process. Therefore, once the second stage of the contempt process would be reached, the Trial Division of this Court would surely be in a position to avoid that the Crown servants whose personal conduct is in question see their rights under rule 470(2) to be violated.

[3]                 Furthermore, although some similar facts might have to be reviewed under the summary proceedings and the possible contempt proceedings, these two proceedings call for different principles and different standards of proof. Therefore, I am satisfied under the present circumstances that there is not a serious prospect for inconsistent findings or an abuse of the Court's process to allow the Direction of the Associate Chief Justice to stand.

Richard Morneau   

                                           Prothonotary


                                                                 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                              TRIAL DIVISION

Date : 20020314

Docket : T-195-01

BETWEEN:

DR. NOËL AYANGMA

                                                                                                                                                                                    Plaintiff

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                                                                                                                                                Defendant

                                                                                                                                                                            

                                                            REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

                                                                                                                                                                            

                                                                           


                                                                 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                              TRIAL DIVISION

                                                       COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


DOCKET:

STYLE OF CAUSE:


T-195-01

DR. NOËL AYANGMA

                                                                              Plaintiff

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                                          Defendant


WRITTEN MOTION EXAMINED IN MONTREAL WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES

REASONS FOR ORDER OF:Richard Morneau, Esq., Prothonotary

DATED:March 14, 2002

WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS BY:


Mr. Noël Ayangma

for the Plaintiff


Ms. Jessica Pereira

for the Defendant


SOLICITORS OF RECORD:


Mr. Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

for the Defendant


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.