Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content




Date: 19990806


Docket: IMM-5896-98



Between:

     NGOYA SIDONNIE MBIKAYI

     Applicant

     AND

     THE MINISTER

     Respondent


     Judicial review of the decision dated October 16, 1998, by members Régis Dionne and Jean Bruneau, Q.C. of the Convention Refugee Determination Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board, in file No. M96-12516.

     [Section 82.1 of the Immigration Act]

     ORDER AND REASONS FOR ORDER

NADON J.

[1]      I am of the view that the application for judicial review must be dismissed.

[2]      The Refugee Division determined that certain aspects of the applicant"s story were not credible and therefore rejected the claim for refugee status.

[3]      According to the Refugee Division, the applicant"s testimony concerning her arrest, and in particular her escape five weeks later, was implausible.

[4]      The Refugee Division also determined that the applicant"s testimony concerning the circumstances which enabled her to get back into touch with her spouse living in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, was implausible. The Refugee Division described this portion of the applicant"s testimony as [TRANSLATION] "far-fetched and unbelievable".

[5]      In light of the evidence, I am of the view that no intervention is warranted in the instant case, despite the very able representations of Ms. Fiset.

[6]      The Refugee Division"s findings concerning the applicant"s testimony are not unreasonable. For example, there was nothing to stop her from calling as a witness the pastor Diamo, who lived in Montréal according to the applicant. As the applicant"s testimony with respect to getting back into touch with her spouse was based on the fact that pastor Diamo had met her spouse during a trip to Abidjan, it is difficult to understand why he was not called to testify. His testimony would certainly have had a positive impact and would have corroborated the applicant"s statements.

[7]      In any event, the applicant did not persuade me that I should intervene in the instant case.







     Marc Nadon

     Judge

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC

August 6, 1999



Certified true translation


M. Iveson



     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     TRIAL DIVISION



Date: 19990806


Docket: IMM-5896-98



Between:

     NGOYA SIDONNIE MBIKAYI

     Applicant

     AND

     THE MINISTER

     Respondent














     ORDER AND REASONS FOR ORDER






     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     TRIAL DIVISION

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


COURT NO. :      IMM-5896-98

STYLE OF CAUSE :          NGOYA SIDONNIE MBIKAYI

     Applicant

     AND

     THE MINISTER

     Respondent


PLACE OF HEARING:      MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC

DATE OF HEARING:      AUGUST 5, 1999

ORDER AND REASONS FOR ORDER OF

     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NADON

DATED      AUGUST 6, 1999



APPEARANCES:

Eveline Fiset      Applicant

My Dung Tran Thi      Respondent


SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Montréal, Quebec      Applicant

Morris Rosenberg      Respondent

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Federal Department of Justice

Montréal, Quebec

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.