Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 19980928


Docket: T-1767-98

BETWEEN:

     MANSOUR AHANI

     Plaintiff

     - and-

     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN AND

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

     Defendants

     REASONS FOR ORDER

CAMPBELL J. (Orally)

[1]      This is an application brought in a new action filed being T-1767-98. The stay issues in this action are the same as in the judicial review file IMM-4204-98, about which Mr. Justice Rothstein made the determination on August 21, 1998 that no irreparable harm exists.

[2]      Accordingly, it would not be fair or just to hear this stay application in this action unless I am satisfied there is new evidence, or evidence which Mr. Justice Rothstein did not have before him.

[3]      I find that there is credible evidence which was not before Mr. Justice Rothstein, being the transcript of the proceedings before Mr. Justice Denault in file DES-4-93. In particular, the evidence at page 117, being the evidence of senior CSIS officer Kevin, was not before Justice Rothstein. Therefore, I find it is fair and just to hear this stay application today.

[4]      Having heard the arguments of counsel, I find that the evidence disclosed at page 117 of the transcript referred to above provides good grounds to find that irreparable harm will come to the applicant if the stay is not granted.

[5]      The legal issues in this action are part of a constitutional challenge to provisions of the Immigration Act, and I find that this challenge discloses serious questions to be tried.

[6]      I also find that the balance of convenience certainly resides with the Applicant. He has been in custody for five years, awaiting the outcome of these proceedings. There is no suggestion of his release. The harm he will face if sent to Iran far exceeds the harm to the Respondent of his staying in custody pending the determination of these legal issues.

[7]      Therefore, I grant a stay of deportation until the legal issues are finally determined in this action.

[8]      Given the argument of the Respondent that delay results in prejudice to the Respondent of rights under the statutory provisions impugned in this action, I further direct that, by consent, this action and the judicial review in file IMM-4204-98 be specially managed together, the purpose being to find the earliest possible date for a hearing of both cases to be conducted at the same time. Accordingly, I also direct that an expeditious hearing be

provided on both of these files.

     "Douglas Campbell"

     Judge

WINNIPEG, MANITOBA

September 28, 1998

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     TRIAL DIVISION

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT NO.:                  T-1767-98

STYLE OF CAUSE:              Mansour Ahani v. Her Majesty the Queen and the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

PLACE OF HEARING:              Toronto, Ontario

DATE OF HEARING:              September 21, 1998

REASONS FOR ORDER

OF THE COURT:                   The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell

                        

DATED:                      September 28, 1998

APPEARANCES:

Barbara Jackman      for the Plaintiff

Donald MacIntosh      for the Defendants

Department of Justice

Ontario Regional Office

130 King Street West

Suite 3400, Box 36

Toronto, Ontario

M5X 1K6

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Jackman, Waldman & Associates      for the Plaintiff

281 Eglinton Ave East

Toronto, Ontario

M4P 1L3

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada      for the Defendants

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     TRIAL DIVISION


Date: 19980928


Docket: T-1767-98

BETWEEN:

MANSOUR AHANI

     Plaintiff

- AND -

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN AND

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

     Defendants

    

     REASONS FOR ORDER

    

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.