Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content






Date: 20000912


Docket: T-545-00



BETWEEN:


PO KIT POON


Applicant


-and-



THE MINISTER OF

CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION


Respondent


     REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

GILES A.S.P.


[1]      The motion before me seeks an order permitting the filing and service nunc pro tunc of the Applicant's Application Record. This motion is opposed by the Respondent because of the patent injustice of a nunc pro tunc order in the time frame of the existing case and for other reasons.

[2]      Before I can extend time I must be satisfied that no injustice will be done to the Respondent, that the delay has been excused and that an arguable case exists.

[3]      A nunc pro tunc order would make it impossible for the Respondent to file a responding record without moving for an extension. The Respondent is therefore prejudiced.

[4]      The delay has apparently resulted because a retaining solicitor did not pay the barrister in advance. I question whether a barrister having accepted a brief can justify abandoning the client if fees are not paid to him. Some detail of the retainer would be recognized before an unusual proposition in this regard could be accepted.

[5]      With regard to an arguable case being shown, the only evidence tendered was by way of a copy of the impugned decision and reasons therefore being attached to a reply. It is not anticipated by the Rules that the reply will include evidence unless leave is granted.

[6]      The motion for an extension will therefore be dismissed. But, because initially the Respondent was willing to extend time, I conclude there may be some evidence of an arguable case although it was not presented to me and for that reason will grant leave to re-apply within a reasonable time.





ORDER

[7]      Motion dismissed with leave to re-apply before September 30th, 2000.

                                 "Peter A. K. Giles"

     A.S.P.

Toronto, Ontario

September 12, 2000
































FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                         Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

                                                

COURT NO:                          T-545-00
STYLE OF CAUSE:                      PO KIT POON

            

                             - and -
                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

                             AND IMMIGRATION

CONSIDERED AT TORONTO, ONTARIO PURSUANT TO RULE 369

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY:                      GILES A.S.P.
DATED:                          TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2000

WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS BY:              Ms. Nancy Lam

                                 For the Applicant

                             Ms. Leena Jaakkimainen

                                 For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:              Nancy Lam     

                             Barrister & Solicitor

                             206 Bloor St. West

                             Suite 3

                             Toronto, Ontario

                             M5S 1T8                     

                                 For the Applicant

                             Morris Rosenberg

                             Deputy Attorney General of Canada

                                 For the Respondent                                 


                                        




                                

                             FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA


                                 Date: 20000912

                        

          Docket: T-545-00

                             Between:

                             PO KIT POON

            

                             - and -

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

                             AND IMMIGRATION

                            

        

                             REASONS FOR ORDER

                             AND ORDER

                            

    

    

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.