Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 19980922


Docket: IMM-4030-97

BETWEEN:

     CAROLINA ELIZABETH LOVATO QUINTEROS

     Applicant

     - and -

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

     Respondent

     REASONS FOR ORDER

CAMPBELL, J.:

[1]      Referring to the applicant, the reasons of the CRDD in this case contain the following statement:

             The fact that she allegedly manufactured a completely false account of her circumstances to the Visa officer (Exhibit M-1) persuades me that she lacks integrity and that she fails to demonstrate a sincere desire to tell the truth. Moreover, her attitude and demeanour during her testimony did not persuade me that she wished to be any more truthful during her hearing than she had been in procuring her Canadian visitor's visa. [Emphasis added]             

[2]      During argument, counsel for the respondent agreed that the quoted statement exposes a reviewable error. In addition, in the respondent's memorandum of argument, a number of other findings of the CRDD are specifically not relied upon, the implication being that they expose reviewable errors as well. Nevertheless, counsel for the respondent argued that other findings against the applicant can be accepted as correct and, on these only, the judicial review application can be dismissed.

[3]      I find that the statement quoted above discloses a negative view held by the decision maker towards the applicant which made it impossible for the applicant to have a fair hearing of her refugee claim. I also find that there is no way to extract the view expressed from the balance of the decision since it had a direct impact on all other findings made. While I generally agree that in judicial review proceedings it is possible to find that some errors do not have a direct impact on the validity of the decision reached, this is not such a case.

[4]      Accordingly, I set the CRDD's decision aside and refer this matter to a differently constituted panel for redetermination.

                         "Douglas R. Campbell"

                         Judge

Toronto, Ontario

September 22, 1998

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

COURT NO:                          IMM-4030-97

STYLE OF CAUSE:                      CAROLINA ELIZABETH LOVATO QUINTEROS

                             - and -

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

DATE OF HEARING:                  TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1998

PLACE OF HEARING:                  TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:              CAMPBELL, J.

DATED:                          TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1998

APPEARANCES:                     

                             Mr. Lorne Waldman

                                 For the Applicant

                             Mr. David Tyndale appeared

                             for Mr. Kevin Lunney

                                 For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

                             Jackman, Waldman & Associates
                             Barristers & Solicitors
                             281 Eglinton Ave. E.
                             Toronto, Ontario
                             M4P 1L3

                            

                                 For the Applicant

                              Morris Rosenberg

                             Deputy Attorney General

                             of Canada

                                 For the Respondent

                            

                             FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                 Date: 19980922

                        

         Docket: IMM-4030-97

                             Between:

                             CAROLINA ELIZABETH LOVATO QUINTEROS

     Applicant

                             - and -

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                        

     Respondent

                    

                            

            

                                                                                 REASONS FOR ORDER

                            


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.