Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                                  Date: 20050119

                                                                                                                      Docket: IMM-8929-03

                                                                                                                          Citation: 2005 FC 78

BETWEEN:

                                                 MANONMANY SABARATNAM

                                                  THUROPATHA SABARATNAM

                                              PAVALAKANTHAN SABARATNAM

                                                 JEEVAKUMARI SABARATNAM

                                                  LOGAMALINI SABARATNAM

                                                                                                                                           Applicants

                                                                           and

                           THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                                        REASONS FOR ORDER

PHELAN J.

[1]                The Applicant, on behalf of herself and her four children, challenges the decision of the Pre-Removal Risk Assessment Officer (the PRRA Officer) that the Applicant was not at risk in being returned to Sri Lanka despite the contention that there had been a change in country conditions resulting from the alleged breakdown in the accord between the government and the Tamil Tigers.

[2]                At the time of the decision the Applicant was a 58 year old mother of four children ranging in age from 15 to 21. Their application for refugee protection had been denied.


[3]                Mr. Justice Rouleau, in granting a stay of removing pending this judicial review, made extensive comments on the merits of the PRRA decision. Justice Rouleau found that the decision failed to show adequate consideration of the then breakdown in the peace accord or of the location to which the Applicant would be sent or the risk of recruitment by the LTTE of her minor children.

[4]                Having had a more complete opportunity to review the matter than the circumstances allowed Justice Rouleau, I share some of the same concerns, perhaps with less force than Justice Rouleau.

[5]                Given the somewhat cursory analysis exhibited in this PRRA decision of the impact of changed country conditions on the Applicant and her children, and, the selective use of evidence concerning the breakdown of the peace accord, I am not satisfied that this decision should be sustained, even given the high degree of deference said to be owed the PRRA Officer.


[6]                Therefore this application for judicial review will be granted and the matter remitted to another PRRA Officer for redetermination. No question will be certified.

                                                                                                                         (s) "Michael L. Phelan"          

Judge


                                                             FEDERAL COURT

                            NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                           IMM-8929-03

STYLE OF CAUSE:               MANONMANY SABARATNAM, THUROPATHA SABARATNAM, PAVALAKANTHAN SABARATNAM, JEEVAKUMARI SABARATNAM, LOGAMALINI SABARATNAM v. MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

PLACE OF HEARING:                     Toronto, Ontario

DATE OF HEARING:                       October 21, 2004

REASONS FOR ORDER:                Phelan J.

DATED:                                              January 19, 2005

APPEARANCES:

Mr. John O. Grant                                                                                          FOR THE APPLICANT

Mr. Brad Gotkin                                                                                         FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS ON THE RECORD:

Mr. John O. Grant

Toronto, Ontario                                                                                             FOR THE APPLICANT

Mr. John H. Sims

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario                                                                                          FOR THE RESPONDENT

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.