Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040129

Docket: IMM-690-04

Citation: 2004 FC 141

                                     

BETWEEN:

                                                        VANI ATANASOVA MILEVA

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                                                  THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                                            REASONS FOR ORDER

[1]                 The applicant sought a stay of her prospective removal from Canada pending a decision concerning her application for permanent residence based on humanitarian and compassionate grounds (H & C application). Following the hearing on January 28, 2004, an Order was issued denying the application for a stay. These are brief reasons for the Court's decision.


[2]                 The applicant, a citizen of Bulgaria and her common-law spouse, a citizen of the Philippines, were denied refugee status in Canada. They have a Canadian-born child since January 2002. The applicant was advised that a decision was made with respect to her application concerning her Pre-removal Risk Assessment and that she was to attend at a meeting on January 15, 2004.

[3]                 On January 7, 2004, the applicant and her common-law spouse filed an application for permanent residence based on humanitarian and compassionate grounds, which is still outstanding.

[4]                 Assuming without deciding that there was a serious issue to be tried in this matter, I was not satisfied that the applicant had met the second element in the tripartite test in Toth v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) (1988), 86 N.R. 302 (F.C.A.).

[5]                 The applicant is being removed to the United States and then, probably to Bulgaria. It is incumbent upon the applicant to adduce evidence of irreparable harm and it must also be of a serious likelihood. I was not persuaded that such evidence was present in this case.

[6]                 The Court understands that the consequence of deportation will cause dislocation of the family but it does not constitute irreparable harm (Parsons v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2003 FC 913, [2003] F.C.J. No. 1161 (QL), at paragraph 10; Celis v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 FCT 1231, [2002] F.C.J. No. 1161 (T.D.) (QL)).

[7]                 I therefore issued an Order denying the application for a stay of removal of the applicant. The Court urges however that the H & C application be dealt with in a timely manner.

             "Michel Beaudry"                                                                                                                                         Judge

OTTAWA, Ontario

January 29, 2004


                                                                 FEDERAL COURT

                                                          SOLICITORS OF RECORD

                                                                                   

DOCKET:                                                                 IMM-690-04

STYLE OF CAUSE :                                               VANI ATANASOVA MILEVA

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                                       

PLACE OF HEARING :                                        Ottawa, Ontario by teleconference

DATE OF HEARING :                                           January 28, 2004

REASONS FOR ORDER BY :                           The Honourable Mr. Justice Beaudry

DATED :                                                                  January 29, 2004

APPEARANCES :

Frank Felkai                                                                FOR THE APPLICANT

Gordon Lee                                                                 FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD :

Rochon Genova                                                           FOR THE APPLICANT

Toronto, Ontario

Morris Rosenberg                                                        FOR THE RESPONDENT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada                        

Toronto, Ontario

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.