Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 19981117


Docket: IMM-3393-98

BETWEEN:

     SAMIR FAWAZ,

     Applicant,

     - and -

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

     AND IMMIGRATION,

     Respondent.

     REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

EVANS, J.

[1]      On the basis of Sajjan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1997), 39 Imm. L.R. (2d) 56 (F.C.A.), I am bound to conclude that subsection 81.1(2) of the Immigration Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7 [as amended] applies only to decisions made by visa officers, and not by the Minister or by anyone else, on or in connection with an application under sections 9, 10 or 77 of the Act.

[2]      The Applicant must therefore apply for leave to commence an application for judicial review of the Minister's decision that she is not satisfied that the admission of the Applicant, who is inadmissible by virtue of paragraph 19(1)(f)(iii)(b) of the Immigration Act, would not be detrimental to the national interest.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

     The Respondent's Motion for an Order striking out the Applicant's notice of application is granted.         

                             (Sgd.) "John M. Evans"

                                 Judge

Vancouver, British Columbia

November 17, 1998

     FEDERAL COURT TRIAL DIVISION

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT NO.:              IMM-3393-98

STYLE OF CAUSE:          SAMIR FAWAZ

                     v.

                     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL.

REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER OF EVANS, J.

dated November 17, 1998

WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS BY:

     Mr. Daryl Larson          for Applicant

     Ms. Lorie Jane Turner      for Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

     Larson, Suleman, Sohn

     & Boulton

     Vancouver, BC          for Applicant

     Morris Rosenberg          for Respondent

     Deputy Attorney General

     of Canada


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.