Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 19980915


Docket: IMM-4563-98

BETWEEN:

     SIBYLLE GOEBEL,

         Applicant,

     - and -

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

     AND IMMIGRATION,

         Respondent.

     REASONS FOR ORDER

     (Delivered orally from the Bench

     at Vancouver, B.C. on September 14, 1998)

MCKEOWN, J.

[1]      The Applicant seeks a stay of a departure order. In my view, I have no jurisdiction to grant the stay requested: see Rajan v. M.E.I., IMM-4548-94 and IMM-4549-94 and Brown v. M.C.I., IMM-441-98.

[2]      Even if I had jurisdiction, there is no irreparable harm to the Applicant. In Calderon v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1996), 30 Imm.L.R. (2d) 256, Madame Justice Simpson states the test for irreparable harm, as formulated by Mr. Justice MacKay:

                 In Kerrutt v. Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration) (1992), 53 F.T.R. 93, Mr. Justice MacKay concluded that, for the purposes of a stay application, irreparable harm implies the serious likelihood of jeopardy to an applicant's life or safety. This is a very strict test and I accept its premise that irreparable harm must be very grave and more than the unfortunate hardship associated with the breakup or relocation of a family.                 
                      (paragraph 22)                 

In the case at bar, there is no evidence of jeopardy to the Applicant's life or safety if she returnes to Germany.

[3]      The balance of convenience also favours the Respondent. The Respondent must enforce the provisions of the Act. Even if there might be a serious issue on the departure order, her departure will not prevent the leave application from going forward, nor will the review of the decision, which denied her permanent immigration status, be terminated. The Applicant can retain counsel to argue her judicial review application on December 8, 1998 or seek to have the matter dealt with in writing. There are also other alternatives.

[4]      In light of these findings on two of the three parts of the tripartite test for a stay, the Applicant's application for a stay is dismissed.

                             (Sgd.) "William P. McKeown"

                                     Judge

Vancouver, British Columbia

September 15, 1998


     FEDERAL COURT TRIAL DIVISION

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

HEARING DATED:          September 14, 1998

COURT NO.:              IMM-4563-98

STYLE OF CAUSE:          Sibylle Goebel

                     v.

                     The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

PLACE OF HEARING:          Vancouver, British Columbia

REASONS FOR ORDER OF MCKEOWN, J.

dated September 15, 1998

APPEARANCES:

     Ms. Sibylle Goebel          on her own behalf

     Ms. Sandra Weafer          for the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

     Ms. Sibylle Goebel          on her own behalf

    

     Morris Rosenberg          for Respondent

     Deputy Attorney General

     of Canada


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.