Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20020827

Docket: T-1507-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 914

BETWEEN:

                                                            JEAN CLAUDE PASCAL

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                                                ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                   

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                                            REASONS FOR ORDER

PINARDJ.

[1]                 This is a motion by the applicant appealing an order of Prothonotary Morneau dated

June 19, 2002, dismissing his application for judicial review for delay on the basis of paragraph 382(2)(a) of the Federal Court Rules, 1998.

[2]                 The effect of the prothonotary's decision was to put an end to the main proceeding, so I must therefore consider the matter de novo.


[3]                 Following the notice of status review indicating to the applicant that more than 180 days had elapsed since the filing of the notice of application for judicial review and that no requisition for a hearing date had been filed, the applicant was required to show cause why his application should not be dismissed for delay, by means of written representations served and filed on or before April 26, 2002.

[4]                 The record shows that the only reason given by the applicant to attempt to justify his failure to file a requisition for a hearing date was that he [TRANSLATION] "was often busy in other personal matters that had priority" and that [TRANSLATION] "the applicant must be in a peaceful state of mind." In my view, that mere general allegation is far from being sufficient to constitute the required justification. Moreover, the applicant wrongly persisted in wanting to consider his application as an action rather than as an application for judicial review. He never proposed an action plan to continue his proceeding.

[5]                 In the circumstances, it is clear that the applicant does not meet the requirements laid down by case law, in particular Grenier v. Canada (January 30, 2001), Doc. A-474-00 (F.C.A.), Lignum Ltd. v. "Azur" (The) (February 14, 2000), Doc. A-458-98 (F.C.A.) and Baroud v. Canada (M.C.I.) (1998), 160 F.T.R. 91 (T.D.).

     

[6]                 Accordingly, the motion is dismissed and the application for judicial review is dismissed for delay.

    

                       "Yvon Pinard"                         

                                 Judge                              

Montréal, Quebec

August 27, 2002

  

Certified true translation

S. Debbané, LLB


Date: 20020827

Docket: T-1507-01

Montréal, Quebec, August 27, 2002

Present: The Honourable Mr. Justice Pinard

BETWEEN:

                                                            JEAN CLAUDE PASCAL

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                                                ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                   

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                                                            ORDER

The applicant's motion appealing the decision of Prothonotary Morneau dated

June 19, 2002, is dismissed. As a result, the applicant's application for judicial review is dismissed for delay on the basis of paragraph 382(2)(a) of the Federal Court Rules, 1998.

            "Yvon Pinard"                  

Judge                         

Certified true translation

S. Debbané, LLB


                     

                                                       

                        FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                      TRIAL DIVISION

Date: 20020827

Docket: T-1507-01

Between:

                                JEAN CLAUDE PASCAL

                                                                                               Applicant

                                                    and

                    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                       

                                                                                          Respondent

                                                                                                                                              

                                REASONS FOR ORDER

                                                                                                                                              


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                 TRIAL DIVISION

                                                          SOLICITORS OF RECORD

                                                                                   

DOCKET:                                             T-1507-01

STYLE OF CAUSE:                           JEAN CLAUDE PASCAL

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                                                ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                   

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:                     Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:                       August 26, 2002

REASONS FOR ORDER: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PINARD

DATE OF REASONS:                       August 27, 2002

APPEARANCES:

Jean Claude Pascal                                                                         FOR THE APPLICANT

(representing himself)

Michel Mathieu                                                                               FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Morris Rosenberg                                                                           FOR THE RESPONDENT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.