Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 19980219


Docket: IMM-4899-96

BETWEEN:

     ARTHURINE DENIZ THOMAS

     Applicant

     - and -

     MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

     Respondent

     REASONS FOR ORDER

McGILLIS, J.

[1]      Despite the able argument of counsel for the applicant, I have not been persuaded that the Immigration and Refugee Board ("Board") committed any error in determining that the applicant was not a Convention refugee.

[2]      The applicant is a citizen of Jamaica who came to Canada as a visitor in 1991. She made a refugee claim in 1994, on the basis that she had a well-founded fear of persecution in Jamaica by reason of her political opinion.

[3]      Counsel for the applicant argued, among other things, that the applicant had not been provided with "effective" notice that the question of an internal flight alternative would be raised at the hearing before the Board. I cannot accept that submission. At the outset of the hearing, the refugee hearing officer indicated that an internal flight alternative was an issue to be canvassed. Furthermore, the applicant was represented by counsel who asked her questions during her testimony concerning the possibility of an internal flight alternative. In the circumstances, I am satisfied that the applicant was provided with adequate notice that the issue of an internal flight alternative would be raised at the hearing.

[4]      I have also not been persuaded that the Board committed any error in determining that an internal flight alternative was available to the applicant in another area of Jamaica. Furthermore, it was reasonably open to the Board to conclude, on the basis of the evidence in the record, that state protection was available to the applicant, and that her fear of persecution was not objectively well-founded. Finally, the Board was entitled to consider in its assessment the applicant's lengthy delay in making her claim to refugee status.

[5]      The application for judicial review is dismissed. The case raises no serious question of general importance.

"D. McGillis"

Judge

Toronto, Ontario

February 19, 1998

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

DOCKET:                          IMM-4899-96

STYLE OF CAUSE:                      ARTHURINE DENIZ THOMAS

                             - and -

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

                             AND IMMIGRATION

DATE OF HEARING:                  FEBRUARY 19, 1998

PLACE OF HEARING:                  TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:              McGILLIS, J.

DATED:                          FEBRUARY 19, 1998

APPEARANCES:                 

                             Mr. Davies Bagambiire

                            

                                 For the Applicant

                             Ms. Lori Hendriks

                                 For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:         

                             Mr. Davies Bagambiire

                             502-347 Bay Street

                             P.O. Box 662

                             Station Adelaide

                             Toronto, Ontario

                             M5C 2J8

                                 For the Applicant

                             George Thomson

                             Deputy Attorney General

                             of Canada

                                  For the Respondent


                                                                            FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
                                             Date: 19980219
                                             Docket: IMM-4899-96
                                                                          BETWEEN:
                                                                 
                                             ARTHURINE DENIZ THOMAS
                                                  Applicant
                                             - and -
                                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
                                             AND IMMIGRATION
                                                  Respondent
                                            
                                                         
                                                                                                          REASONS FOR ORDER
                                            

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.