Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20041221

Docket: IMM-9983-04

Citation: 2004 FC 1765

Ottawa, Ontario, this 21st day of December, 2004

Present:           The Honourable Mr. Justice Mosley                                   

BETWEEN:

                                      FARHAD HATAMI and ADILA BAGHIROVA

                                                                                                                                           Applicants

                                                                           and

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                            REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

[1]                The applicants Farhad Hatami and Adila Baghirova request an Order prohibiting the Minister from removing them from Canada on January 6, 2005. The applicants are citizens of Iran who have lived most of their lives in Azerbaijan. They came to Canada and unsuccessfully claimed refugee status. The underlying application on this motion is a negative Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRAA) that was completed September 10, 2004 and communicated to them on November 18, 2004.

[2]                The test to be applied on an application for a stay of removal is the tripartite test in Toth v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) (1988), 86 N.R. 302 (F.C.A).

[3]                I have considered the materials submitted and heard counsel for the parties. The applicants submit that there are a number of serious issues, including the standard of proof used by the PRAA officer, the significant documentary evidence that contradicted the officer's decision, and the personal characteristics of the applicants not having been considered cumulatively. The threshold for accepting that a serious issue exists is a low one, and I accept that the applicants have raised serious questions related to at least one of these issues, namely the standard of proof employed.

[4]                While I do not find that the applicants would suffer any irreparable harm from a removal to the United States, I also accept that it is likely that the applicants will be removed to either Azerbaijan or Iran from there. In my view, the applicants have met the threshold for establishing the risk of irreparable psychological or physical harm should they be removed to Iran or Azerbaijan from the United States.

[5]                I also accept that the Minister has an interest in upholding the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act by executing deportation orders as soon as is reasonably practicable, but find that the potential harm the applicants would suffer outweighs the public interest in this case. The balance of convenience favours the granting of this application.


[6]                As a result of the foregoing, the application for a stay of removal will be allowed.

                                                                       ORDER

THIS COURT ORDERS that the application for a stay of the removal of Farhad Hatami and Adila Baghirova is granted pending the final disposition of the application for judicial review of the Pre-removal Risk Assessment of September 10, 2004.

" Richard G. Mosley "

    F.C.J.


                                                             FEDERAL COURT

                                                      SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                          IMM-9983-04

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          FARHAD HATAMI

ADILA BAGHIROVA and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                             

PLACE OF HEARING:                    Toronto, Ontario

DATE OF HEARING:                      December 20, 2004

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY:                            The Honourable Mr. Justice Mosley

DATED:                                             December 21, 2004

APPEARANCES:

John Grice                                                                                 FOR THE APPLICANT

Angela Marinos                                                                         FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

JOHN GRICE                                                                          FOR THE APPLICANT

Davis & Grice

Barristers & Solicitors

Toronto, Ontario

MORRIS ROSENBERG                                                          FOR THE RESPONDENT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.