Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 19981118


Docket: IMM-3699-97

BETWEEN:

     ZAWAR SHAHID

     Applicant

     - and -

     MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

     Respondent

     REASONS FOR ORDER

ROTHSTEIN J.

[1]      The judicial review must be dismissed. The applicant submits that the visa officer did not properly consider the question of whether he was a diesel mechanic by failing to take into account or assessing him on the basis of his experience in Pakistan. However, her function is to assess him according to the standards contained in the job descriptions in the CCDO and now the NOC. With respect to his qualifications as a diesel mechanic, there is no detail in the material that he apparently submitted to the visa officer to substantiate the fact that he was in fact a diesel mechanic.

[2]      The visa officer concluded that it was appropriate to award him 0 points for experience and I cannot see that her conclusion was incorrect in that respect.

[3]      The applicant submits that he should have been considered under subsection 11(3) of the Immigration Act, R.S.C. 1985, C. I-2, however, the conclusion of the visa officer was that although she did consider him to have certain positive factors weighing in his favour, overall he could not be successfully established in Canada. She was, therefore, not able to consider him under subsection 11(3).

[4]      The applicant then submits that there is an apprehension of bias because the visa officer questioned the validity of his degree and his experience letter. That is the function of the visa officer and it does not demonstrate bias for the visa officer to consider such matters and to question the applicant about them.

[5]      The applicant has not satisfied me that there has been any error of law or jurisdiction by the visa officer in this case.

[6]      The judicial review is dismissed.

"Marshall Rothstein"

Judge

CALGARY, Alberta

November 18, 1998

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

COURT NO:                          IMM-3699-97

STYLE OF CAUSE:                  ZAWAR SHAHID

                             - and -

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND

                             IMMIGRATION

                            

DATE OF HEARING:                  THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 1998

PLACE OF HEARING:                  TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:              ROTHSTEIN, J.

DATED:                          WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1998

APPEARANCES:                      Mr. Malik Zaman

                            

                                 For the Applicant

                            

                             Ms. Sally Thomas

                                 For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:              Malik Zaman & Associates Ltd.

                             Barristers & Solicitors

                             1436 Danforth Avenue                                          Toronto, Ontario

                             M4J 1N4

                            

                                 For the Applicant

                              Morris Rosenberg

                             Deputy Attorney General

                             of Canada

                                 For the Respondent

                

                             FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                 Date: 19981118

                        

         Docket: IMM-3699-97

                             Between:

                             ZAWAR SHAHID

                            

     Applicant

                             - and -

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                        

     Respondent

                    

                        

            

                                                                                 REASONS FOR ORDER

                        

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.