Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20051205

Docket: IMM-10367-04

Citation: 2005 FC 1651

Toronto, Ontario, December 5, 2005

PRESENT:      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VON FINCKENSTEIN                

BETWEEN:

                            ZEINAB TAHA, MAHDI YAACOUB, AMIRA YAACOUB,

                         HAJAR YAACOUB, ALI YAACOUB AND ABBAS YAACOUB

                                                                                                                                           Applicants

                                                                           and

                           THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                            REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER                    

(Given orally from the bench and subsequently written for clarification and precision)

[1]                Zeinab Taha (the AApplicant@) is 40 years old and a citizen of Lebanon. The other Applicants are her children, also Lebanese citizens, ranging in age from 10 to 18. Her claim is based on three aspects:

a)         an alleged conversion to Christianity;

b)         the alleged persecution of her husband by Hezbollah for ripping off a poster with a picture of Hezbollah leaders from the wall of his store; and


c)         a professed fear of forcible recruitment of her son by Hezbollah.

[2]                The Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board (the ABoard@) rejected her claim. It found the Applicant not credible. It concluded that the Applicant had

failed to establish her conversion to Christianity, that the alleged incident involving the Hezbollah poster did not take place, and that there was no objective evidence of forcible Hezbollah recruitment.

[3]                It is not disputed that the standard of review regarding findings of credibility is patent unreasonableness: see Aguebor v. Minister of Employment and Immigration (1993), 160 N.R. 315 (F.C.A.).

[4]                The Applicants= argument that the Board over-emphasized the importance of the alleged poster incident, and used it to taint the entire testimony of the Applicant, cannot be sustained. The decision of the Board, while placing great stress on the poster incident, is also based on the following undisputed facts:

i)          there is no evidence of the Applicant=s alleged conversion to Christianity: she was in the United States for three years prior to coming to Canada, yet no evidence of membership in a church or of conversion/baptism was presented;


ii)         there is reason to doubt the Applicant=s subjective fear, given that she lived for six years at the same address in Lebanon, and that her husband lived for six years in Beirut (separate from her) without persecution by Hezbollah;

iii)         the documentary evidence shows that a) Hezbollah does not forcibly recruit as they do not have a lack of volunteers, and that b) Hezbollah does not target Christians, but only high profile ex-Hezbollah members; and

iv)        the Applicant spent over three years in the United States, yet never made a claim for refugee status.

[5]                All of these facts amply support the decision of the Board. It therefore cannot be said that the decision was patently unreasonable. Accordingly this application cannot succeed.


                                                                       ORDER

THIS COURT ORDERS that this application be dismissed.

"K. von Finckenstein"      

            Judge

                                                          


FEDERAL COURT

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                IMM-10367-04

STYLE OF CAUSE:                 ZEIBAB TAHA AND OTHERS

                                                                                                                        Applicants

and

THE MINISTER CITIZENSHIP AND                                                                                    IMMIGRATION

Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:            TORONTO, ONTARIO

DATES OF HEARING:            DECEMBER 5, 2005

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY:                    VON FINCKENSTEIN J.

DATED:                                    December 5, 2005

APPEARANCES BY:

Sandra Saccucci Zaher                                                 FOR THE APPLICANTS

Meilka Visnic                                                                FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Sandra Saccucci Zaher                                      FOR THE APPLICANTS

Barrister & Solicitor

Windsor, Ontario

John H. Sims, Q.C.                                                      FOR THE RESPONDENT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.