Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040914

Docket: IMM-6459-03

Citation: 2004 FC 1242

Toronto, Ontario, September 14th, 2004

Present:           The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell                                

BETWEEN:

                                                                AHMED YOSUF

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                           and

                               MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                            REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

[1]                In the present case, the Applicant, a citizen of Bangladesh, claims Convention refugee status on the basis of a well-founded fear of persecution because of his "political opinion".

[2]                In the end result, the IRB did not accept the Applicant's evidence of persecution based on findings of negative credibility and implausibility.

[3]                A central feature of the negative credibility finding is a comparison of a purported Bangladesh government generated document called an "FIR" (First Information Report) and a document generated by the Applicant's political party called a "BNP certificate". In conducting the comparison, the IRB made two key findings which are in fundamental contradiction. On the one hand, the IRB found that the statements in the FIR contradict the statements in the BNP certificate, and, therefore, the discrepancy raises serious concerns regarding the credibility of the claimant's evidence. However, on the other hand, the IRB also found that the FIR is not a genuine document.

[4]                I find that the fundamental contradiction constitutes a fundamental reviewable error which renders the decision as patently unreasonable.

                                                                       ORDER

Accordingly, the IRB's decision is set aside and the matter is referred back to a differently constituted panel for redetermination.

"Douglas R. Campbell"

                                                                                                                                                   J.F.C.                       


FEDERAL COURT

                                                                             

                            NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                           IMM-6459-03             

STYLE OF CAUSE:               AHMED YOSUF                                                                                

Applicant

and

MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                          Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:                     TORONTO, ONTARIO

DATE OF HEARING:                       SEPTEMBER 14, 2004

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY:                             CAMPBELL J.

DATED:                                              SEPTEMBER 14, 2004

APPEARANCES BY:

Ms. Preevanda K. Sapru                                              FOR THE APPLICANT

Mr. Marcel Larouche                                                    FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Preevanda K. Sapru                                         

Toronto, Ontario                                                           FOR THE APPLICANT

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario                                                           FOR THE RESPONDENT


FEDERAL COURT

                                                          Date: 20040914

                                              Docket: IMM-6459-03

BETWEEN:

AHMED YOSUF

                                                                    Applicant

and

MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                Respondent

                                                                                               

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER

                                                                          


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.