Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

    



Date: 20000608


Docket: IMM-3877-99


BETWEEN:

     ISAAC OLYMUYIWA OLAOLUWA AYANKOJO

     Applicant


     - and -




     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

     AND IMMIGRATION

     Respondent



     REASONS FOR ORDER

REED J. (orally)

[1]      I can find no error that would entitle me to set aside the decision under review. The CRDD applied the correct law, as set out in Usuf v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration (1995), 179 N.R. 11 (F.C.A.). While counsel for the applicant referred to the decision in Penate v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1994] 2 F.C. 79 (T.D.), that decision must be read in the light of Osei v. Canada (Secretary of State) (1997), 133 F.T.R. 182, a decision rendered after Usuf.

[2]      The CRDD"s factual findings are supported by the evidence before it. I cannot find that it "based its decision on an erroneous finding of fact made in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard to the material before it" - the test that must be applied, described in paragraph 18.1(4)(d) of the Federal Court Act . The applicant"s argument can be described as asking the Court to reach a different decision from that reached by the CRDD because he does not agree with that decision. This is not the role of the Court on judicial review.

[3]      With respect to the section 2(3) of Immigration Act, again I can find no error in law on the approach the CRDD took, and its factual findings cannot be said to fall within paragraph 18.1(4)(d) of the Federal Court Act.

[4]      For these reasons given, this application will be dismissed.

                             "B. Reed"

     J.F.C.C.

Toronto, Ontario

June 8, 2000














     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

COURT NO:                      IMM-3877-99
STYLE OF CAUSE:                  ISAAC OLUMUYIWA OLAOLUWA AYANKOJO

                         - and -

                         THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                

DATE OF HEARING:              THURSDAY, JUNE 8, 2000
PLACE OF HEARING:              TORONTO, ONTARIO
REASONS FOR ORDER BY:          REED J.

                            

DATED:                      THURSDAY, JUNE 8, 2000

APPEARANCES:                  Mr. Joel Etienne
                             For the Applicant
                        

                         Ms. Negar Hashemi             

                             For the Respondent
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:          Mr. Joel Etienne

                         Barrister and Solicitor

                         50 Richmond St. E. Suite 101

                         Toronto, Ontario

                         M5C 1N7         

                             For the Applicant
                         Morris Rosenberg
                         Deputy Attorney General of Canada

                                        

                             For the Respondent

                         FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA


                                 Date: 20000608

                        

         Docket: IMM-3877-99


                         Between:

                         ISAAC OLUMUYIWA OLAOLUWA AYANKOJO

     Applicant


                         - and -


                         THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

                         AND IMMIGRATION


     Respondent


                    

                        

            

                         REASONS FOR ORDER

                        

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.