Docket: T-1180-97
Toronto, Ontario, Thursday, the 29th day of November, 2001
PRESENT: Peter A. K. Giles, Esquire
Associate Senior Prothonotary
BETWEEN:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART CANADA INC.
Plaintiffs
-and-
CRAZY LEE'S (ST. CATHARINES) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S
(TORONTO) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (WELLAND) LIMITED,
CRAZY LEE'S (WESTERN) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (PICKERING)
LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (PORT COLBORNE) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S
(RICHMOND HILL) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (SIMCOE) LIMITED,
CRAZY LEE'S (SOUTHERN) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (ONTARIO)
LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (OSHAWA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S
(OTTAWA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (PEEL) LIMITED, CRAZY
LEE'S (PENNINSULA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (MISSISSAUGA)
LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (NEWMARKET) LIMITED, CRAZY
LEE'S (NIAGARA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (NORTHERN) LIMITED,
CRAZY LEE'S (NORTHWOOD) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (HAMILTON) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (INTERNATIONAL) LIMITED, CRAZY
LEE'S (KAWARTHA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (LONDON) LIMITED,
CRAZY LEE'S (MIDLAND) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (BARRIE)
LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (CLEARANCE CENTRE) LIMITED,
and CRAZY LEE'S (EASTERN) LIMITED, ARON LEE HABERMAN
(a.k.a. LEE ARON HABERMAN)
Defendants
[1] The Defendants seek a better affidavit of documents in connection with the Plaintiffs' claim for damages to its goodwill. The Plaintiffs have filed various affidavits which were used in a successful motion for summary judgment which mention dollars worth of sales and dollars spent on advertising. But the Plaintiffs fail to list the documents which enabled the affiants to swear to their various quantitative statements.
[2] There are cases as the Plaintiffs have submitted where damages have been awarded for the diminution of goodwill when there are no comparative figures to show such diminution. However, in this case the Plaintiffs have stated they intend to rely on the affidavits which show quantities in fairly precise amounts. So precise that I question whether they come from someone's memory. If the affidavits are relevant, so may be the documents showing the quantities sworn to by the affiants. I should point out that the listing of the affidavits does not prove the relevance of them or their content. But, the affidavit filed by the Plaintiffs in connection with this motion indicates they will rely on the affidavits.
ORDER
1. The Plaintiffs shall have 15 days to list in an affidavit of documents those documents which support the figures sworn to in the affidavit filed and to produce the same. If they are audited figures, nothing behind the audited figures needs to be produced at this stage.
2. Costs of the preparation of the documents for this motion to the Defendants in any event of the reference.
"Peter A. K. Giles"
A.S.P.
Toronto, Ontario
November 29, 2001
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record
COURT NO: T-1180-97
STYLE OF CAUSE: WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART CANADA INC.
Plaintiffs
- and -
CRAZY LEE'S (ST. CATHARINES) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (TORONTO) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (WELLAND) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (WESTERN) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (PICKERING) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (PORT COLBORNE) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (RICHMOND HILL) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (SIMCOE) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (SOUTHERN) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (ONTARIO) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (OSHAWA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (OTTAWA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (PEEL) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (PENNINSULA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (MISSISSAUGA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (NEWMARKET) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (NIAGARA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (NORTHERN) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (NORTHWOOD) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (HAMILTON) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (INTERNATIONAL) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (KAWARTHA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (LONDON) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (MIDLAND) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (BARRIE) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (CLEARANCE CENTRE) LIMITED, and CRAZY LEE'S (EASTERN) LIMITED, ARON LEE HABERMAN (a.k.a. LEE ARON HABERMAN)
Defendants
MATTER CONSIDERED AT TORONTO, ONTARIO PURSUANT TO RULE 369
AMENDED REASONS FOR ORDER
AND ORDER BY: GILES A.S.P.
DATED: THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2001
Page: 2
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS: Mr. John S. Macera, and
Ms. Adele J. Finlayson
For the Plaintiffs
Mr. Glenn R. Solomon, and
Mr. Mark S. Shapiro
For the Defendants
SOLICITORS OF RECORD Macera & Jarzyna
Barristers & Solicitors
1200-427 Laurier Avenue West
Ottawa, Ontario
K1R 7Y2
For the Plaintiffs
Solomon, Grosberg
Barristers & Solicitors
55 University Avenue
Suite 1704
Toronto, Ontario
M5J 2H7
For the Defendants
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
Date: 20011129
Docket: T-1180-97
Between:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART CANADA INC.
Plaintiffs
- and -
CRAZY LEE'S (ST. CATHARINES) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (TORONTO) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (WELLAND) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (WESTERN) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (PICKERING) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (PORT COLBORNE) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (RICHMOND HILL) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (SIMCOE) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (SOUTHERN) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (ONTARIO) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (OSHAWA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (OTTAWA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (PEEL) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (PENNINSULA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (MISSISSAUGA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (NEWMARKET) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (NIAGARA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (NORTHERN) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (NORTHWOOD) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (HAMILTON) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (INTERNATIONAL) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (KAWARTHA) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (LONDON) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (MIDLAND) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (BARRIE) LIMITED, CRAZY LEE'S (CLEARANCE CENTRE) LIMITED, and CRAZY LEE'S (EASTERN) LIMITED, ARON LEE HABERMAN (a.k.a. LEE ARON HABERMAN)
Defendants
AMENDED REASONS FOR
ORDER AND ORDER