Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 19980603


Docket: IMM-1651-97

BETWEEN:

     PUVANESWARAN SINNATHURAI

     Applicant

     - and -

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

     Respondent

     REASONS FOR ORDER

HEALD, D.J.

[1]      This is an application for Judicial Review of the decision of the Convention Refugee Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board dated March 24, 1997, wherein the Board determined that the applicant herein is not a Convention refugee.

The facts

[2]      The applicant is a 27 year old male, born in the Jaffna region of Sri Lanka. He claims persecution in the Jaffna region by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam (LTTE). He lived and worked in that region for most of his life. He said that he had difficulties especially with Upali, an LTTE leader. He alleges persecution in the form of forced labour, detention and physical abuse. He also claims persecution by the Colombo police in the form of detention and physical abuse.

The Decision of the Board

[3]      The Board concluded that the applicant's evidence was not credible. The basis for this conclusion was inconsistencies between the applicant's oral evidence and the information set out in his Personal Information Form. In the Board's view, these inconsistencies related to the alleged persecution in both Jaffna and Colombo. These inconsistencies and inaccuracies may be detailed as follows:

(a)      The applicant's Personal Information Form (PIF) stated that he was a security guard until 1988. In his oral evidence, he said that he was a security guard only until 1982.

(b)      In his PIF, the applicant claimed to have had an electrical shop from December 1988 until June 1990. In his testimony he deposed that he had such a shop for only about seven months in 1990.

(c)      In his PIF, he said that the LTTE forced him to unload goods in December of 1994, whereas, in his testimony, he stated that this had occurred in June of 1994;

(d)      According to his PIF, the applicant was detained for eight days in December of 1994. However, in his testimony, he said he was detained for eight days in February of 1994, but was further detained for two months in December of 1994.

(e)      The applicant testified that the police detained him for 2 days in Colombo commencing on January 29, 1996. Later he said this detention lasted for four days.

Analysis

[4]      The Board concluded that there was inadequate credible evidence to support a finding that the applicant was a Convention refugee. In my view the Board had ample reason, on this record, for making adverse findings of credibility with respect to the applicant's evidence. This is a case where the Board chose to believe the documentary evidence over the applicant's sworn testimony. Such an approach is acceptable where, as here the Board clearly indicated why it preferred the documentary evidence over the applicant's viva voce evidence.1

Conclusion

[5]      Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth supra, the within application for judicial review is dismissed.

Certification

[6]      Neither counsel requested that a serious question of general importance be certified pursuant to Section 83 of the Immigration Act. I agree. No question will be certified.

                             "Darrel V. Heald"

                                 D.J.

Toronto, Ontario

June 3, 1998

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

COURT NO:                          IMM-1651-97

STYLE OF CAUSE:                      PUVANESWARAN SINNATHURAI

    

                             - and -

    

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND      IMMIGRATION

                            

DATE OF HEARING:                  JUNE 3, 1998

PLACE OF HEARING:                  TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:              HEALD, D.J.

DATED:                          JUNE 3, 1998

APPEARANCES:                     

                             Ms. Maureen Silcoff

                                     For the Applicant

                             Mr. Kevin Lunney

                                     For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:             

                             Lewis & Associates

                             175 Harbord Street

                             Toronto, Ontario

                             M5S 1H3

        

                                     For the Applicant

                              George Thomson

                             Deputy Attorney General

                             of Canada

                                     For the Respondent


                            

                             FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                 Date: 19980603

                        

         Docket: IMM-1651-97

                             Between:

                             PUVANESWARAN SINNATHURAI

     Applicant

                             - and -

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                        

     Respondent

                    

                            

            

                                                                                     REASONS FOR ORDER

                            


__________________

     1      Compare Aligolian v. MCI , April 22, 1997 - IMM-3684-96      See also Ghavim v. MCI, July 8, 1997 - IMM-3370-96      See also Ojo v. MCI, July 23, 1997 - IMM-2441-96

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.