Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 19981202


Docket: T-611-98

BETWEEN:

                 DEANNA LYNNE HANSON

     Petitioner

     - and -

                 ELMER ANTON HANSON

     Respondent


AMENDED REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

CAMPBELL, J.:

[1]      Subsequent to the filing of my reasons in this matter dated October 23, 1998, as requested therein, I received a draft order from Mr. Fisher, counsel for the applicant, which I asked be approved before signature by Mr. Merchant, counsel for the respondent.

[2]      Subsequent to this request being made, upon comparison of the order with my reasons, I realized that, respecting the precise amounts payable under s.7(1) of the Guidelines, there are errors or omissions in the reasons. Having regard to paragraph 21 of the reasons, while these errors or omissions do not in any way affect the total amount found payable by the respondent under s.7(1), they require clarification and correction, and, accordingly for this purpose, pursuant to Rule 397(2) of the Federal Court Rules, I asked for a conference call with counsel.

[3]      During the conference call conducted on November 26, 1998, Mr. Merchant argued that I am functus. As no order had yet been signed, I rejected this argument.

[4]      I find that the draft order submitted accurately details the s.7(1) amounts proved in evidence and are, therefore, payable. As a result, I hereby amend paragraphs 9 to 13 of my reasons to read as follows:

         (a) child care expenses: s.7(1)(a)                 
         [9]      Ms. Braun claims the amount of $1,615.00 per year after tax as a child care expense. I find that, on her evidence, Ms. Braun proved that this amount is paid only due to her inability to care for the children directly related to her employment.                 
         (b) medical and dental insurance: s.7(1)(b)                 
         [10]      Since Ms. Braun is not permanently employed she must pay for necessary Blue Cross medical coverage. I, therefore, find that $387.00 per year is properly claimed in addition to the Guidelines amount.                 
         (c ) prescription drugs and glasses: s.7(1)(c)                 
         [11]      Braden is asthmatic and requires special medication in the amount of $233.36 per year. He also requires glasses which will undoubtedly cost $139.00 per year to replace. I find these health care related expenses are warranted.                 
         (d) extraordinary education expenses: s.7(1)(d)                 
         [12]      Within this category the claim is for private organ lessons for Braden in the amount of $528.00 per year and non-private organ lessons for Kiara in the amount of $490.00 per year.                 
         [13]      I am impressed by Ms. Braun"s evidence that, from both an educational and self esteem point of view, it is healthy for both these children to have the lessons. Braden has already shown particular promise as a musician. In my opinion, this rather substantial expense is not one which should be paid by Ms. Braun on merely $728.00 per month, given the ordinary food, clothing, housing and general activity demands which these children make. Therefore, I find it is an "extraordinary" expense which meets the needs of these children, and is properly claimed. I find the expense for books in the sum of $40 per year falls within this category as well.                 

                         "Douglas Campbell"

                                 Judge

EDMONTON, ALBERTA

December 2, 1998.

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     TRIAL DIVISION

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT NO.:                  T-611-98

STYLE OF CAUSE:      DEANNA LYNNE HANSON v. ELMER ANTON HANSON

PLACE OF HEARING:              Regina, Saskatchewan

DATE OF HEARING:              September 30, 1998         

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT          The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell

OF THE COURT:                  

                        

DATED:                      December 2, 1998

APPEARANCES

Denis Fisher      for the Petitioner

Anthony Merchant      for the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

Robertson Stromberg

600 - 106 Twenty First Street East

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

S7K 0B3      for the Petitioner

Merchant Law Group

Saskatchewan Drive Plaza

2401 Saskatchewan Drive

Regina, Saskatchewan

S4P 4H8      for the Respondent

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.