Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

 

 

Date: 20061003

Docket: T-98-05

Citation: 2006 FC 1176

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

ROBERT GRUNDY

 

Applicant

and

 

 

CANADA CUSTOMS AND

REVENUE AGENCY

 

Respondent

 

 

 

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS

Charles E. Stinson

Assessment Officer

[1]               This application for judicial review, seeking relief from penalties and interest relative to the failure to report income, was dismissed with costs. I issued a timetable for written disposition of the assessment of the Respondent’s revised bill of costs

 

[2]               The Applicant did not file any materials in response to the Respondent’s materials. My view, often expressed in comparable circumstances, is that the Federal Courts Rules do not contemplate a litigant benefiting by an assessment officer stepping away from a position of neutrality to act as the litigant’s advocate in challenging given items in a bill of costs. However, the assessment officer cannot certify unlawful items, i.e. those outside the authority of the judgment and the tariff. I examined each item claimed in the revised bill of costs and the supporting materials within those parameters. There were items which might have attracted disagreement, but the amount claimed in total in the revised bill of costs is generally arguable within the limits of the award of costs as reasonable in the circumstances of this litigation. The Respondent’s revised bill of costs is assessed and allowed as presented at $2,708.15.

 

 

“Charles E. Stinson”

Assessment Officer


FEDERAL COURT

 

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                          T-98-05

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          ROBERT GRUNDY v. CCRA

 

 

 

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES

 

 

 

REASONS FOR ASSESSMENT OF COSTS:                    CHARLES E. STINSON

 

DATED:                                                                                 October 3, 2006

 

 

 

WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:

 

n/a

FOR THE APPLICANT

 

Marla Teeling

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

n/a

FOR THE APPLICANT

 

Mr. John H. Sims, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.