Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

Date: 20070606

Docket: T-1301-06

Citation: 2007 FC 605

[ENGLISH TRANSLATION]

Montréal, Quebec, June 6, 2007

PRESENT: Richard Morneau, Esq., Prothonotary

 

 

 

In the matter of the Canada Labour Code,

R.S.C. (1985), c. L-2 as amended.

 

And in the matter of an order on dismissal

 made by arbitrator Jean-Paul Boily on August 19, 2005,

under subsection 242(4) of the Canada Labour Code,

R.S.C (1985), c. L-2 as amended and

regarding Mr. Gilles Gagnon, 1218 Richard Street

Blainville, QC J7C 3H7 and Transport Car-Fré Ltée,

 233 Albert-Mondou Street, St-Eustache, QC J7R 7A7

 

And in the matter of filing said order with the Federal Court

 under subsection 244(1) of the Canada Labour Code.

 

REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

[1]               WHEREAS the adverse party, Transport Car-Fré Ltée, both in this docket and in T-1302-06, requested by means of letters dated May 23, 2007, that its objection to a real property seizure that was carried out on March 19, 2007 (Transport Car-Fré’s objection) be handled in writing, in accordance with Rule 369 of the Federal Courts Rules;

[2]               WHEREAS the Court is of the view that this review approach may be retained, and that in that respect, the reply record submitted by Transport Car-Fré on May 23, 2007, is hereby accepted for filing;

[3]               WHEREAS in adjudging Transport Car-Fré’s objection on the merits, the Court finds that the arbitration award dated August 19, 2005 (the arbitration award), is fully enforceable and that Transport Car-Fré’s objection is in reality a disguised appeal or application for judicial review of the arbitration award, and that such means cannot be admitted, given the final judgment by this Court on January 9, 2007.

[4]               WHEREAS article 596 of the Code of Civil Procedure cannot be applied in the case at hand to defeat the seizure carried out on March 19, 2007.

[5]               AFTER reading and analyzing the various motion records filed by the parties.

            THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

-                     It dismisses the objection by Transport Car-Fré Ltée.

-                     The Reasons for Order and Order in this docket also apply, mutadis mutandis, in docket T-1302-06, and a copy of said Reasons and Order will also be placed therein.

-                     The garnisher is entitled to a set of costs for both dockets.

 

Richard Morneau

Prothonotary

 


FEDERAL COURT

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

DOCKET:                                          T-1301-06

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          In the matter of the Canada Labour Code, et al

                                                            regarding:

                                                            TRANSPORT CAR-FRÉ LTÉE

                                                            Adverse Claimant

                                                            and

                                                            GILLES GAGNON

                                                            partie saisissante

 

 

WRITTEN MOTION REVIEWED AT MONTRÉAL WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES

 

 

REASONS FOR ORDER                 PROTHONOTARY MORNEAU

 

DATED:                                             June 6, 2007

 

 

WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS:

 

Pierre-Louis Trudeau

 

FOR THE ADVERSE CLAIMANT

Gilles Brunet

 

FOR THE GARNISHER

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Le Cabinet d’Avocats Civilis S.A.

Laval, Quebec

 

FOR THE ADVERSE CLAIMANT

Brunet & Robillard Avocats, s.e.n.c.

Laval, Quebec

 

FOR THE GARNISHER

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.