Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Jagmohan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions
Date 2007-08-30
Neutral citation 2007 FC 873
File numbers IMM-5167-06

Decision Content

 

Date: 20070830

Docket: IMM-5167-06

Citation: 2007 FC 873

Ottawa, Ontario, August 30th, 2007

PRESENT:     The Honourable Mr. Justice O'Reilly

 

 

BETWEEN:

KRIS JAGMOHAN

Applicant

and

 

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT

 

[1]               Mr. Kris Jagmohan came to Canada from Trinidad and Tobago as a farm worker during the autumn months of 2003, 2004 and 2005. He did not return home after his last stint, instead, he remained in Canada and made a claim for refugee protection.

[2]               A panel of the Immigration and Refugee Board heard and dismissed his claim in 2006. Mr. Jagmohan argues that the Board failed to appreciate the essence of his claim and asks me to order a new hearing. I can find no basis for overturning the Board’s decision and must, therefore, dismiss this application for judicial review.

I.        Issue

[3]               Did the Board fail to consider the essence of Mr. Jagmohan’s claim?

 

II.     Analysis

 

[4]               Mr. Jagmohan alleged that he was the victim of a robbery and that he was singled out by the perpetrators because of his race. His ancestry is Indian. He claims that Indians are persecuted by blacks in Trinidad and Tobago, and that the police force, being predominantly black, does not protect the Indian population.

[5]               The Board found that the documentary evidence showed that crime was a genuine problem in Trinidad and Tobago. However, the evidence did not support Mr. Jagmohan’s assertion that Indians are singled out or that the police do not protect them. Accordingly, the Board concluded that Mr. Jagmohan had not been persecuted because of his race or membership in a particular social group, nor was he likely to be exposed to a risk of cruel and unusual treatment, torture or death.

[6]               I have reviewed the entire record carefully and can find no basis for overturning the Board’s decision. Therefore, I must dismiss this application for judicial review. No question of general importance will be certified.

JUDGMENT

 

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT IS THAT:

1.                  The application for judicial review is dismissed;

2.                  No question of general importance is stated.

“James W. O’Reilly”

Judge

 

 

FEDERAL COURT

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                          IMM-5167-06

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          KRIS JAGMOHAN v. MCI

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                    TORONTO, ONTARIO

 

DATE OF HEARING:                      August 15, 2007

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

 AND JUDGMENT:                         O’REILLY  J.

 

DATED:                                             August 30th, 2007

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

 

MR. KRIS JAGMOHAN

 

 

FOR THE APPLICANT (SELF-REPRESENTED)

 

MS. DUPE OLUYOMI

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

MR. KRIS JAGMOHAN

Toronto, Ontario

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

(SELF REPRESENTED)

JOHN H. SIMS, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.