Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

Federal Court

 

Cour fédérale


 


Date: 20110307

Docket: T-26-10

Citation: 2011 FC 267

Toronto, Ontario, March 7, 2011

PRESENT:     The Honourable Mr. Justice Hughes

 

BETWEEN:

 

PUBLIC MOBILE INC.

 

 

Applicant

 

and

 

 

ATTORNEY GENERAL  OF CANADA,

GLOBALIVE WIRELESS MANAGEMENT CORP., BELL CANADA, ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC., SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC., AND TELUS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY

 

 

Respondents

 

and

 

 

ALLIANCE OF CANADIAN  CINEMA, TELEVISION AND RADIO ARTISTS, COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY AND PAPERWORKERS UNION OF CANADA, AND FRIENDS OF CANADIAN BROADCASTING

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interveners

 

          REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER AS TO COSTS

 

[1]               In my Reasons released February 4, 2011 (2011 FC 130) I invited the parties to make submissions as to costs. I have now received those submissions.

[2]               The Respondent, Telus Communications Company, submitted that it would bear its own costs; therefore no costs will be awarded for or against Telus.

 

[3]               Counsel for the Applicant, Public Mobile Inc., by an e-mail to the Court sent February 25, 2011, advised that the Applicant, Public Mobile Inc., the Respondents, Attorney General of Canada and Globalive Wireless Management Corp. have agreed that the Applicant, Public Mobile Inc. should recover its costs from the Attorney General of Canada and Globalive Wireless Management Corp. on a scale being the high end of Column IV, including a second counsel fee, and that quantification should be deferred until the disposition of all appeals. I agree with this submission and will make an Order to that effect.

 


ORDER

 

THEREFORE, THIS COURT ORDERS that further to the Judgment dated February 4, 2011 herein:

1.                  No costs shall be awarded for or against the Respondent, Telus Communications Company;

2.                  The Applicant, Public Mobile Inc. is entitled to recover costs, including disbursements, from the Respondents, the Attorney General of Canada and Globalive Wireless Management Corp. to be assessed at the high end of Column IV. The quantification of such costs, if then required, shall be deferred until after the final disposition of all appeals.

“Roger T. Hughes”

Judge

 


FEDERAL COURT

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

DOCKET:                                          T-26-10

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          PUBLIC MOBILE INC. v. ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF CANADA, GLOBALIVE WIRELESS

MANAGEMENT CORP., BELL CANADA,

ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC., SHAW

COMMUNICATIONS INC., AND TELUS

COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY v. ALLIANCE

OF CANADIAN CINEMA, TELEVISION AND

                                                            RADIO ARTISTS, COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY AND PAPERWORKERS UNION OF CANADA, AND FRIENDS OF CANADIAN BROADCASTING

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                    Ottawa, Ontario

 

DATES OF HEARING:                    January 19 & 20, 2011

 

REASONS FOR ORDER AND

ORDER AS TO COSTS BY:            HUGHES J.

 

DATED:                                             March 7, 2011

 

APPEARANCES:

 

John B. Laskin

Torys LLP, Toronto, ON

 

Michael H. Ryan

Arnold & Porter LLP

London, England

FOR THE APPLICANT

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert MacKinnon

Alexander Gay

FOR THE RESPONDENT (Attorney General of Canada)

 

Thomas G. Heintzman QC

Malcolm M. Mercer

Anna Matas

FOR THE RESPONDENT (Globalive Wireless Management Corp.)

 

 

Kenneth Jull

Stephen Schmidt

FOR THE RESPONDENT (Telus Communications Company)

 

Steven Shrybman

FOR THE INTERVENERS

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Dougald E. Brown

Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP

Barristers & Solicitors

Ottawa, Ontario

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

Myles J. Kirvan

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT (Attorney General of Canada)

McCarthy Tetrault LLP

Barristers & Solicitors

Toronto, Ontario

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT (Globalive Wireless Management Corp.)

Stephen Schmidt

Chief Regulatory Legal Counsel

Telus Communications Company

Ottawa, Ontario

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT (Telus Communications Company

Sack Goldblatt Mitchell LLP

Barristers & Solicitors

Ottawa, Ontario

 

FOR THE INTERVENERS

 

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.