Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

 


Date: 20120820

Docket: IMM-6589-12

Citation: 2012 FC 1006

Ottawa, Ontario, August 20, 2012

PRESENT:    The Honourable Mr. Justice Shore

 

BETWEEN:

 

CHANG WOO LIM, KYUNGSUN BAE, HYELOK JUN LIM

 

 

 

Applicants

 

and

 

 

 

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

 

 

 

Respondent

 

 

 

 

 

           REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

 

[1]               The Applicants seek a stay of removal scheduled for Wednesday, August 29, 2012. Their stay application is linked to their leave application in respect of a negative Pre-Removal Risk Assessment [PRRA].

 

[2]               The Applicants, a couple with their son, are in Canada since 2005. The Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board [IRB] denied their claim. It found that state protection is available to them in their country of origin. The Federal Court denied leave on the basis of the IRB decision, itself.

 

[3]               The Federal Court of Appeal in a recent 2011 decision has specified that the mootness of a PRRA application cannot serve as a basis for irreparable harm (Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v Shpati, 2011 FCA 286).

 

[4]               As is recognized, the conjunctive tripartite test of the Toth v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) (1988), 86 NR 302 (FCA) decision must be fully satisfied for a stay to be granted. If only one of the three criteria is unmet, no stay is to be granted. In this case, all three criteria have not been met. As a result, the stay of removal, on the basis of the PRRA application, is dismissed.

 


ORDER

 

THIS COURT ORDERS that the Applicants’ stay removal application be dismissed.

 

 

“Michel M.J. Shore”

Judge


FEDERAL COURT

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

DOCKET:                                         IMM-6589-12

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                        CHANG WOO LIM, KYUNGSUN BAE, HYEOK JUN LIM v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

 

 

MOTION HELD VIA TELECONFERENCE ON AUGUST 20, 2012 FROM OTTAWA, ONTARIO AND TORONTO, ONTARIO

 

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER:                                  SHORE J.

 

DATED:                                            August 20, 2012

 

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Wennie Lee

 

FOR THE APPLICANTS

 

Amy King

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Lee & Company

Toronto, Ontario

 

FOR THE APPLICANTS

Myles J. Kirvan

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.