Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

 


Date: 20121207

Docket: IMM-8457-11

Citation: 2012 FC 1446

Ottawa, Ontario, December 7, 2012

PRESENT:    The Honourable Mr. Justice Barnes

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

DMYTRO AFANASYEV

 

 

 

Applicant

 

and

 

 

 

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

 

 

 

Respondent

 

 

 

 

 

           SUPPLEMENTARY REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT

 

[1]               In my decision of October 31, 2012, I invited counsel for the Applicant to propose a certified question.  He submitted the following:

Do locally engaged Immigration Officers meet the requirement of being a specialized administrative tribunal as contemplated by the Supreme Court of Canada and if not must a reviewing Court apply a heightened level of scrutiny due to this lack of specialized expertise?

 

 

[2]               Counsel for the Respondent opposes this request saying that there is no basis in law to impose the correctness standard of review on an administrative decision of mixed fact and law.  He also makes the point that the issue raised would not be determinative because the decision was both correct and reasonable.  I agree with this position.  The standard of review that applies to this type of decision is not an issue of legal controversy.  Numerous authorities from the Supreme Court of Canada on down have consistently held that administrative decision-makers, whatever their level of expertise, are entitled to deference on judicial review with respect to issues of fact and mixed fact and law.  Deference is extended by applying the reasonableness standard of review.  My decision also endorsed the Officer’s finding in terms of its legal component.  I agree with the Respondent that the proposed question, however answered, would not change the outcome and is not, therefore, determinative. 

 

[3]               In the result, no question will be certified. 

 


JUDGMENT

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that no question will be certified in connection with the decision rendered on October 31, 2012. 

 

 

"R.L. Barnes"

Judge

 


FEDERAL COURT

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

DOCKET:                                         IMM-8457-11

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                        AFANASYEV v MCI

 

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                  Toronto, ON

 

DATE OF HEARING:                    October 1, 2012

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT:      BARNES J.

 

DATED:                                            December 7, 2012

 

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Gary Segal

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

 

Gregory George

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Rekai LLP

Toronto, ON

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

Myles J. Kirvan

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, ON

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.