Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20171004


Docket: A-192-16

Citation: 2017 FCA 203

CORAM:

WEBB J.A.

BOIVIN J.A.

RENNIE J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

BRENDA JOLY

Appellant

(Respondent by cross-appeal)

and

GORDON GADWA

Respondent

(Appellant by cross-appeal)

Heard at Edmonton, Alberta, on October 4, 2017.

Judgment delivered at Edmonton, Alberta, on October 4, 2017.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

RENNIE J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY:

WEBB J.A.

BOIVIN J.A.

 


Date: 20171004


Docket: A-192-16

Citation: 2017 FCA 203

CORAM:

WEBB J.A.

BOIVIN J.A.

RENNIE J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

BRENDA JOLY

Appellant

(Respondent by cross-appeal)

and

GORDON GADWA

Respondent

(Appellant by cross-appeal)

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

RENNIE J.A.

[1]               This is an appeal and cross appeal from the decision of the Federal Court (per Justice Strickland), cited as 2016 FC 597. In that decision the Court upheld the decision of an Elections Officer appointed under the Kehewin Cree Nation’s custom Elections Act that the respondent, Gordon Gadwa engaged in a corrupt election practice which vitiated his election as Chief. However, the Federal Court set aside the Elections Officer’s decision to declare the second place candidate, Brenda Joly as Chief. The Court also set aside the decision of the Elections Officer to remove Mr. Gadwa as councillor.

[2]               The appellant appeals the judge’s decision to order a new election for Chief of the Kehewin Cree Nation and to reinstate Mr. Gadwa as a Councillor. The respondent, Mr. Gadwa cross-appealed the judge’s decision that the Elections Officer’s finding that he engaged in a corrupt election practice was reasonable. The cross-appeal was abandoned at the outset of the hearing of the appeal. The cross-appeal should be dismissed.

[3]               I would dismiss the appeal for the reasons given by the Federal Court judge. No error has been identified either in the judge’s assessment of the standard of review of the Elections Officer’s decision, nor in the application of that standard to the evidence before her.

[4]               In the circumstances, I would not award costs.

"Donald J. Rennie"

J.A.

“I agree

Wyman W. Webb J.A.”

“I agree

Richard Boivin J.A.”

 


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE FEDERAL COURT DATED MAY 31, 2016, DOCKET NO. T-1875-15 (2016 FC 597)

DOCKET:

A-192-16

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

BRENDA JOLY v. GORDON GADWA

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

Edmonton, Alberta

DATE OF HEARING:

OCTOBER 4, 2017

REASONS FOR judgment BY:

RENNIE J.A.

concurred in by:

WEBB J.A.

boivin j.a.

DATED:

october 4, 2017

APPEARANCES:

Priscilla Kennedy

For The Appellant

Angus Y.M. Cheung

FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

DLA Piper (Canada) LLP

Edmonton, Alberta

For The APPELLANT

Wood Law Office

Edmonton, Alberta

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.