Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20180131


Docket: A-217-17

Citation: 2018 FCA 29

CORAM:

WEBB J.A.

GLEASON J.A.

LASKIN J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

BRIAN HARRIS

Appellant

and

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Respondent

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on January 31, 2018.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on January 31, 2018.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

GLEASON J.A.

 


Date: 20180131


Docket: A-217-17

Citation: 2018 FCA 29

CORAM:

WEBB J.A.

GLEASON J.A.

LASKIN J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

BRIAN HARRIS

Appellant

and

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on January 31, 2018).

GLEASON J.A.

[1]               Mr. Harris appeals from the order of the Federal Court (per Manson, J) in Harris v. Attorney General (Canada), T-1340-16, dated July 5, 2017, dismissing his motion to extend the time to file an appeal from an earlier order made by the Prothonotary. That order had been made approximately six months earlier and struck Mr. Harris’ application for judicial review because it was bereft of any chance of success. The Prothonotary also noted that the application was unintelligible and confusing (Order of Prothonotary Kevin R. Aalto, T-1340-16, dated December 6, 2016).

[2]               The Federal Court applied the correct test for assessing whether the extension should be granted and made no error warranting intervention in applying that test to Mr. Harris’ extension request. Based on the evidence filed, it was certainly open to the Federal Court to have concluded that Mr. Harris had provided an insufficient explanation of the reasons for the delay, that he had failed to show that his application had some prospect of success and that the other criteria for granting the extension had not been met.

[3]               Thus, this appeal must be dismissed with costs fixed in the all-inclusive amount of $250.00.

 “Mary J.L. Gleason”

J.A.

 


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


DOCKET:

A-217-17

 

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

BRIAN HARRIS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

Toronto, Ontario

 

DATE OF HEARING:

January 31, 2018

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.

GLEASON J.A.

LASKIN J.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

GLEASON J.A.

APPEARANCES:

Brian Harris

 

For The Appellant

(SELF-REPRESENTED)

 

Heather Thompson

 

For The Respondent

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Nathalie G. Drouin

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Respondent

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.