Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20180621


Docket: A-52-17

Citation: 2018 FCA 123

[ENGLISH TRANSLATION]

CORAM:

GAUTHIER J.A.

BOIVIN J.A.

DE MONTIGNY J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

 

LE GROUPE PPP LTÉE

 

 

Appellant

 

 

and

 

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

 

Respondent

 

Hearing held at Quebec City, Quebec, on June 21, 2018.

Judgment delivered from the bench at Quebec City, Quebec, on June 21, 2018.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

BOIVIN J.A.

 


Date: 20180621


Docket: A-52-17

Citation: 2018 FCA 123

CORAM:

GAUTHIER J.A.

BOIVIN J.A.

DE MONTIGNY J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

 

LE GROUPE PPP LTÉE

 

 

Appellant

 

 

and

 

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

 

Respondent

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the bench at Quebec City, Quebec, on June 21, 2018)

BOIVIN J.A.

[1]  Despite Ms. Goyette’s able submissions, and while we do not endorse the entirety of the Tax Court of Canada judge’s reasons, we are nevertheless of the opinion that the judge did not commit an overriding error or a determinative error of law that warrants the intervention of this Court.

[2]  The appeal will therefore be dismissed with costs.

“Richard Boivin”

J.A.

Certified true translation

Janine Anderson, Revisor


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE HONORABLE MR. JUSTICE ALAIN TARDIF DATED JANUARY 16, 2017, IN DOCKET 2015-658(GST)G.

DOCKET:

A-52-17

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

LE GROUPE PPP LTÉE v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

QuEbec CITY, Quebec

 

 

DATE OF HEARING:

June 21, 2018

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

GAUTHIER J.A.

BOIVIN J.A.

DE MONTIGNY J.A.

 

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

BOIVIN J.A.

 

 

APPEARANCES:

Nathalie Goyette

Laurie Beausoleil

 

For the appellant

 

Pier-Olivier Julien

For the respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

PwC Law LLP

Montreal, Quebec

 

For the appellant

 

Larivière Meunier

Quebec City, Quebec

For the respondent

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.