Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content




     Date: 19991125

     Docket: A-582-98

Coram:      DÉCARY J.A.

         LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

         NOËL J.A.



Between:

     ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA,

     Plaintiff,

     AND

     MICHEL TURGEON,

     Defendant.


Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, November 25, 1999


Judgment rendered at Montréal, Quebec, November 25, 1999




REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:      DÉCARY J.A.




     Date: 19991125

     Docket: A-582-98

Coram:      DÉCARY J.A.

         LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

         NOËL J.A.



Between:

     ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA,

     Plaintiff,

     AND

     MICHEL TURGEON,

     Defendant.


     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

     (Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec

     on Thursday, November 25, 1999)


DÉCARY J.A.


[1]      The board of referees stated that in its opinion the claimant ("the defendant") had not lost his employment because of his misconduct within the meaning of s. 28(1) of the Unemployment Insurance Act because that misconduct was caused by his problems with alcoholism. The umpire, though he found that in the case at bar the alcoholism was not [TRANSLATION] "well documented by extensive medical evidence", did not intervene in the board of referees" decision as the latter was [TRANSLATION] "responsible for the facts".

[2]      On the contrary, the umpire should have intervened. Even admitting purely for the sake of argument that alcoholism could be relied on to justify misconduct within the meaning of s. 28(1), there was no evidence before the board of referees in the case at bar allowing it to conclude that the alcohol problem alleged by the claimant was such as to allow him to argue this justification. The mere fact of having an alcohol problem is not in itself sufficient to make the exclusion contained in s. 28(1) inapplicable to a claimant.

[3]      The application for judicial review will be allowed with costs, the decision of the umpire quashed and the matter referred back to the chief umpire or such umpire as he shall appoint to be decided on the basis that the Commission"s appeal should be allowed and the board of referees" decision on March 12, 1996 set aside.



     Robert Décary

     J.A.

Certified true translation


Bernard Olivier, LL. B.




FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL



     Date: 19991125

     Docket: A-582-98

Coram:      DÉCARY J.A.

         LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

         NOËL J.A.



Between:

     ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA,

     Plaintiff,

     AND

     MICHEL TURGEON,

     Defendant.





     REASONS FOR ORDER




     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     APPEAL DIVISION

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


COURT No.:          A-582-98
STYLE OF CAUSE:      ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA,

     Plaintiff,

             AND

             MICHEL TURGEON,

     Defendant.


PLACE OF HEARING:      Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:      November 25, 1999

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (DÉCARY, LÉTOURNEAU AND NOËL JJ.A.)

DATED:          November 25, 1999


APPEARANCES:

Francisco Couto      for the plaintiff
Claudine Barabé      for the defendant

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Deputy Attorney General of Canada      for the plaintiff

Ottawa, Ontario

CAMPEAU, OUELLET & ASSOCIÉS      for the defendant

Montréal, Quebec




     Date: 19991125

     Docket: A-582-98

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC, NOVEMBER 25, 1999


CORAM:      DÉCARY J.A.

         LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

         NOËL J.A.


BETWEEN:

     ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA,

     Plaintiff,

     AND

     MICHEL TURGEON,

     Defendant.


     JUDGMENT

     The application for judicial review is allowed with costs, the decision of the umpire quashed and the matter referred back to the chief umpire or such umpire as he shall appoint to be decided by him on the basis that the Commission"s appeal should be allowed and the board of referees" decision on March 12, 1996 set aside.


     Robert Décary

     J.A.

Certified true translation


Bernard Olivier, LL. B.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.