Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20021016

Docket: A-725-00

Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 373

CORAM:        ROTHSTEIN J.A.

NOËL J.A.

SEXTON J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                           ALFRED WILGANOWSKI

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                                                        HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                            THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                          Heard at Winnipeg, Manitoba, on October 8, 2002.

                                 Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 16, 2002.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:                                                                                     SEXTON J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY:                                                                                                   ROTHSTEIN J.A.

                                                                                                                                                     NOËL J.A.


Date: 20021016

Docket: A-725-00

Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 373

CORAM:        ROTHSTEIN J.A.

NOËL J.A.

SEXTON J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                           ALFRED WILGANOWSKI

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                                                        HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                            THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                                        REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

SEXTON J.A.

[1]                 The applicant appeals from the decision of the Pension Appeals Board which had dismissed his appeal from the Review Tribunal. The Review Tribunal had denied his claim for disability benefits under the Canada Pension Plan.

[2]                 The medical evidence before the Pension Appeals Board indicated that the applicant had for some time experienced severe back pain and had been on constant medication for some years.


[3]                 However, there was also medical evidence to the effect that although the applicant could not engage in heavy lifting, twisting, or turning or stand or walk for prolonged periods of time, nevertheless, he would be suitable for light work not involving these activities. The Board found the applicant had given up seeking work and further found that none of the medical reports filed provided objective opinions to support the applicant's evidence that he was unable to perform other employment. The evidence before the Board was such as to allow this conclusion to be reached.

[4]                 Therefore, it cannot be said that the decision of the Pension Appeals Board was patently unreasonable.

[5]                 Before this Court, the applicant continued to maintain that he is incapable of finding work and I have considerable sympathy for the position in which he finds himself. Unfortunately, there is no basis in law on which this Court is able to interfere with the decision of the Pension Appeals Board.

[6]                 The application will be dismissed but, in the circumstances, no costs will be awarded.

                                                                                                                                           "J. Edgar Sexton"             

                                                                                                                                                                  J.A.

"I agree"

Marshall E. Rothstein J.A.

"I agree"

"Marc Noël" J.A.                                                                                                                              


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                 APPEAL DIVISION

                      NAMES OF SOLICITORS AND SOLICITORS ON THE RECORD

  

DOCKET:                                A-725-00

STYLE OF CAUSE:    Alfred Wilganowski v. Her Majesty the Queen, The Attorney General of Canada

PLACE OF HEARING:      Winnipeg, Manitoba

DATE OF HEARING:October 8, 2002

                                                                                                                                                                         

                          REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF

                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SEXTON

                         DATED OCTOBER 16, 2002

                                                                                                                                                                         

APPEARANCES:

Mr. Wilganowski                                                  on his own behalf

Ms. Mary Tobin Oates                                            for the Respondent

Department of Justice

ISP Unit, HRDC Legal Services

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Mr. Wilganowski                                                  on his own behalf

Dauphin, Manitoba

Morris Rosenberg                                                                 

Deputy Attorney General of Canada                              for the Respondent

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.