BETWEEN:
Appellant
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on February 7, 2006.
Judgment delivered at Toronto, Ontario, on February 8, 2006.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: SHARLOW J.A.
MALONE J.A.
Docket: A-235-05
Citation: 2006 FCA 53
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
DANNY LESKIW
Appellant
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
[1] The appellant has failed to demonstrate that Snider J. erred or unreasonably exercised her discretion to deny his March 8, 2005 application to extend time for judicial review of a decision of the Minister of January 9, 2001 to deny his application for retroactive payments of CPP benefits.
[2] The appeal should be dismissed.
"I agree
K. Sharlow J.A."
"I agree
B. Malone J.A."
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-235-05
STYLE OF CAUSE: DANNY LESKIW
Appellant
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
DATE OF HEARING: February 7, 2006
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE APPELLANT
|
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Etobicoke, Ontario
John H. Simms, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa |
FOR THE APPELLANT
FOR THE RESPONDENT |