Date:20000609
Docket:A-383-97
CORAM: LINDEN, J.A.
ROTHSTEIN, J.A.
MALONE, J.A.
BETWEEN:
MARY WALL
Appellant
(Plaintiff)
- and -
VAL BRUNELL and ORTHO-McNEIL INC.
Respondents
(Defendants)
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, Tuesday, June 6, 2000
Judgment Delivered at Toronto, Ontario
on Friday, June 9, 2000
| REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: MALONE, J.A. |
| IN AGREEMENT: LINDEN, J.A. |
| IN AGREEMENT: ROTHSTEIN, J.A. |
Date: 20000609
Docket: A-383-97
CORAM: LINDEN, J.A.
ROTHSTEIN, J.A.
MALONE, J.A.
BETWEEN:
MARY WALL
Appellant
(Plaintiff)
- and -
VAL BRUNELL and ORTHO-McNEIL INC.
Respondents
(Defendants)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
MALONE J.A.
[1] This is an appeal from the Order of the Honourable Mr. Justice Richard of the Trial Division (as he then was), dated May 13, 1997, (the "Order") which amended the style of cause of the action by adding "Janssen-Ortho Inc." as a defendant in the action.
[2] As appeal 414-97 was dismissed, this appeal has been rendered moot and accordingly this appeal will also be dismissed with the one set of costs to the Respondents.
"B. Malone"
J.A.
"I agree" Linden J.A.
"I agree" Rothstein J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record
| DOCKET: A-383-97 |
| STYLE OF CAUSE: MARY WALL |
- and -
| VAL BRUNELL and ORTHO-McNEIL INC. |
DATE OF HEARING: TUESDAY, JUNE 6, 2000
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
| REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: MALONE J.A. |
| IN AGREEMENT: LINDEN J.A. |
| IN AGREEMENT: ROTHSTEIN J.A. |
| DATED: FRIDAY, JUNE 9, 2000 |
APPEARANCES: Ms. M. Wall
| For the Appellant (Plaintiff), on her own behalf |
Mr. G. Daniel
| For the Respondents (Defendants) |
| SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Mary Wall |
1172 Bay Street
Suite 264
Toronto, Ontario
M5S 2B4
| For the Appellant (Plaintiff), on her own behalf |
| Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP |
Barristers & Solicitors
Commerce Court West
2800-199 Bay St.
P.O. Box 25
Stn. Commerce Court
Toronto, Ontario
M5L 1A9
| For the Respondents (Defendants) |
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
Date: 20000609
Docket: A-383-97
BETWEEN:
| MARY WALL |
Appellant
(Plaintiff)
- and -
VAL BRUNELL and ORTHO-McNEIL INC.
Respondents
(Defendants)
| REASONS FOR JUDGMENT |