Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040209

Docket: A-171-03

Citation: 2004 FCA 62

CORAM:        ROTHSTEIN J.A.

EVANS J.A.

PELLETIER J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                             JANSSEN-ORTHO INC.

                                                                                                                                                      Appellant

                                                                                 and

THE MINISTER OF HEALTH and

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                               Respondents

                                            Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on February 9, 2004.

                    Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on February 9, 2004.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                               ROTHSTEIN J.A.


Date: 20040209

Docket: A-171-03

Citation: 2004 FCA 62

CORAM:        ROTHSTEIN J.A.

EVANS J.A.

PELLETIER J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                             JANSSEN-ORTHO INC.

                                                                                                                                                      Appellant

                                                                                 and

THE MINISTER OF HEALTH and

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                               Respondents

                                       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

                          (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on February 9, 2004)

ROTHSTEIN J.A.


[1]                 In spite of counsel's able argument, we have not been convinced that this case is distinguishable from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health) (2003), 28 C.P.R. (4th) 1, 2003 FCA 299. Nor have we been persuaded that the Court in Novartis was manifestly wrong in the sense that it overlooked a relevant statutory provision i.e. section 4 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations, SOR/93-133, as amended by SOR/98-166.

[2]                 Having regard to Novartis and Miller v. Canada (Attorney General) (2002), 220 D.L.R. (4th) 149, 2002 FCA 370, we will dismiss this appeal with costs to the respondents of $2,000 inclusive of disbursements.

                                                                                                                                      "Marshall Rothstein"                   

                                                                                                                                                                  J.A.                          

                                                                                                                                                                       


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

DOCKET:                                              A-171-03

STYLE OF CAUSE:              JANSSEN-ORTHO INC.

                                                                                                                                                        Appellant

and

THE MINISTER OF HEALTH and

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                                   Respondents

DATE OF HEARING:                        FEBRUARY 9, 2004

PLACE OF HEARING:                      TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF

THE COURT BY:                                 (ROTHSTEIN, EVANS & PELLETIER JJ.A.)

DELIVERED FROM THE

BENCH BY:                                          ROTHSTEIN J.A.

APPEARANCES BY:                       

Ms. Sheila Block

Mr. Andrew Shaughnessy    

FOR THE APPELLANT

Ms. Marie Crowley

FOR THE RESPONDENTS

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Torys LLP

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE APPELLANT

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENTS                


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.