Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20011119

Docket: A-477-00

Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 350

CORAM:        RICHARD C.J.

DÉCARYJ.A.

NOËL J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                                    LOUIS GAGNON

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                                                ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                   

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                   Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on November 19, 2001

Judgment delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on November 19, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                                   RICHARD C.J.


Date: 20011119

Docket: A-477-00

Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 350

CORAM:        RICHARD C.J.

DÉCARYJ.A.

NOËL J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                                    LOUIS GAGNON

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                                                ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                   

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

                                          (Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec

                                                               on November 19, 2001)

RICHARD C.J.

[1]                 We are of the view that the Umpire made no error that warrants our intervention by concluding that the applicant was not disinterested, that he worked in order to save his father's business and that he benefited from it since he was receiving $90 weekly from the business.


[2]                 The application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs.

                     "J. Richard"                     

                           C.J.

Certified true translation

Sophie Debbané, LL.B.


                                                  

                     FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                                                  

Date: 20011119

Docket: A-477-00

Between:

                                                                                          LOUIS GAGNON

                                                                                      Applicant

and                                                                                    

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

CANADA

                                                                                  Respondent

                                                                                                                              

                       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

                                    OF THE COURT

                                                                                                                              


Date: 20011119

Docket: A-477-00

Montréal, Quebec, November 19, 2001

Coram:        RICHARD C.J.

                     DÉCARY J.A.

                     NOËL J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                                          LOUIS GAGNON

                                                                                                                                                                    Applicant

                                                                                       and

                                                       ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                         

                                                                                                                                                                Respondent

                                                                              JUDGMENT

The application for judicial review is dismissed with costs.

                    "J. Richard"                     

                          C.J.

Certified true translation

Sophie Debbané, LL.B.                                                                                                                                                     


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                                    NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT FILE NO.:                           A-477-00

CORAM:                                              RICHARD, C.J.

DÉCARY, J.A.

NOËL, J.A.

STYLE OF CAUSE:                           LOUIS GAGNON                                                                    

Applicant

and

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:                    Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:                       November 19, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

                                                 BY THE HONOURABLE RICHARD C.J.

DELIVERED:                                     November 19, 2001

APPEARANCES:

William DeMerchant                              FOR THE APPLICANT

Pauline Leroux                                       FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Ouellet, Nadan & Associés

Montréal, Quebec                                  FOR THE APPLICANT

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Montréal, Quebec                                  FOR THE RESPONDENT                                                       

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.