Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20060512

Docket: A-38-06

Citation: 2006 FCA 218

Present:           NADON J.A.

BETWEEN:

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Appellant

and

DANIEL THAMOTHAREM

Respondent

Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties.

Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on June 12, 2006.

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:                                                                                       NADON J.A.


Date: 20060512

Docket: A-38-06

Citation: 2006 FCA 218

Present:           NADON J.A.

BETWEEN:

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Appellant

and

DANIEL THAMOTHAREM

Respondent

REASONS FOR ORDER

NADON J.A.

[1]                Although I agree entirely with the appellant that the Canadian Council for Refugees (the Council) does not, by reason of Prothonotary Milczynski's Order of June 21, 2005, have an "automatic" right to intervene in this appeal, I am nonetheless satisfied that, in the circumstances of this case, leave ought to be granted to the Council.

[2]                Accordingly, I will make such an Order, specifying the conditions under which leave is granted.

"M. Nadon"

J.A.


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                                               A-38-06

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                               M.C.I. v. DANIEL THAMOTHAREM

MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:                                              NADON J.A.

DATED:                                                                                  June 12, 2006

WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:

John Provart

FOR THE APPELLANT /

Catherine Bruce and Angus Grant

FOR THE PROPOSED INTERVENOR

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

John H. Sims Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, ON

FOR THE APPELLANT /

The Law Offices of Catherine Grant

Toronto, ON

FOR THE PROPOSED INTERVENOR

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.